IJAR.2018.345

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 6; Issue 4.1 (October 2018)

Page No.: 5787-5802

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2018.345

MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF FORAMEN MAGNUM IN ADULT HUMAN DRY SKULL OF GUJARAT REGION

Bharat.J.Sarvaiya 1, Shital.Bhishma. Hathila *2, Jagdish.S.Chaudhari 3, Nilesh.C.Fichadiya 4.

1 M.S.Anatomy, Associate Professor, Anatomy Department, P.D.U.Govt.Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

*2 Assistant  Professor, Anatomy Department, Medical College, Baroda, Gujarat, India.

3 Associate Professor, Anatomy Department, Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.

4 Tutor, PSM Department, P.D.U.Govt. Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

Corresponding Author: Dr. Shital.Bhishma. Hathila, A-13,Darshanam Villa-2, Near Sapphire School, Near Savita Hospital, Parivar cross road, Waghodia Road, Baroda, Gujarat, India. Mobile: 9825121336 E-Mail: bhishushital@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

Background: Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum of dry human skulls in Gujarat region was carried out to demonstrate the anatomical variations in morphology. The measurements of the foramen magnum are clinically important because vital structures passing through it. There are certain diseases associated with compression of structure present in foramen magnum like arnold chiari malformation (tonsillar herniation), achondroplasia, stenosis of foramen magnum, meningioma and atlanto-occipital fusion.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to measure anteroposterior & transverse diameter of foramen magnum, surface area and index of foramen magnum and to observe its various shapes. Materials and methods: 326 dry skulls of adult human being were studied. Antero-posterior and Transverse Diameter were measured by using a digital vernier caliper. The surface area and foramen magnum index were calculated. The cranial base was visually assessed for the shape of foramen magnum.

Results: The mean antero-posterior and transverse diameter of the foramen magnum were 34.18 ± 2.74 mm and 28.49 ± 2.13 mm respectively. The mean surface area and the foramen magnum index were 766.86 ± 104.76 mm2 and 83.60 ± 6.21 mm respectively. The percentages of different shapes of foramen magnum were: Oval (42.33%), Round (32.82%), Tetragonal (8.59%), Hexagonal (7.67%), Pentagonal (4.60%), and irregular (3.99%).

Conclusion: The knowledge of various dimensions & shape of the foramen magnum help to determine some malformations like arnold chiari syndrome in which the transverse diameter is increased. The antero-posterior diameter of foramen magnum was more than the transverse diameter and most common shape of foramen magnum was found to be Oval.

KEY WORDS: Skull, Morphometry, Foramen Magnum, Antero-Posterior diameter, Transverse diameter.

REFERENCES

  1. Vishram Singh, Textbook of clinical embryology; Elsevier India; 2015, 1e, p93.
  2. Datta A.K, Essentials of human anatomy, Head & Neck; Current books international, Kolkata India; 2007 4th ed, p56.
  3. Standring S,Gray’s Anatomy:The anatomical basis of clinical practice. elsevier, churchil livingstone, Edingerg; 2016, 41st ed, p 422.
  4. Snell, Richard S. ”Clinical Neuroanatomy, Lippincott williams & wilkins,Philadelphia; 2010” 7th ed , p.195.
  5. Sgouros S, Goldin HJ, Hockely AD, Wake MJ, et al. Intracranial volume change in childhood. J Neurosurge.1999;610-616.
  6. Gardner WJ, Goodall RJ. The surgical management of Arnold-Chiari malformation in adults.An explanation of its mechanism and importance of encephalography in diagnosis. J neurosurg 1950;7:199-206.
  7. Hecht TJ, Horton WA, Reid CS, et al. Growth of the foramen magnum in achondroplasia. American Journal of Medical Genetics.1989;32:528-35.
  8. Muthukumar N, Swami Nathan R, Venkatesh G, Bhanumathy SP. A morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum region as it relates to thetranscondylar approach. ActaNeurochir (Wien).2005;147(8):889-95.
  9. Breathnach A.S, Frazer’s Anatomy of the human skeleton, 6th edition, 1960; p-179.
  10. Radinsky L. Relative brain size a new measure. Science 1967;155:836-838.
  11. Martin R. Saller K. Lehrbuch de Anthropologie. Band 1.Stuttgart: Gustov Fisher Verlag, 1957; 455-509.
  12. Rajkumar, Prabhakaran k, Punita Manik,Vikram Singh, morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum of dry human skulls in north indian population, Int J Anat Res 2017;5(1):3480-84.ISSN 2321-4287 3480.
  13. Abhinavkumar Mishra,shashi bhushan pandey,chandan kumar yadav, mahboobul haque,naresh Chandra, Morphometric study of foramen magnum of skull in poplation in Uttar Pradesh.Int J anat Res 2018,6(2.2):5186-90.
  14. C.Singh,Gunjan Rai,Rahul Rai,Morphological Variations of the Foramen Magnum in adult Human Dry Skull in Eastern UP(India)Population Int J Med Res Prof. 2017;3(2): 205- 8.
  15. Lucas A.S.Pires, Álvaro R. Teixeira, Tulio F. O. Leite, Marcio A. Babinski and Carlos A. A.Chagas, Morphometric aspects of the foramen magnum and the orbit in Brazilian dry skulls Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2016;5(4):34-42.
  16. Sampada p k, Poornima b, Mallikarjun m, Santosh b sakri, Morphometric and Morphological study of foramen magnum in dried human skull bones. Int J Anat Res 2017;5(2.1):3682-86.
  17. Remya K,Pretty Rathnakar ,Swathi evaluation of foramen magnum in dry human skulls of dakshina kannada district, Int J Anat Res 2017;5(4.1):4488-91.
  18. Radhika P.M,Shailaja Shetty,Prathap K.J,C.Sheshgiri,Jyothi K.C,Morphometric study of foramen magnum in adult human skull in indian population, Asian j of med clin sci.2014;3(2).
  19. Deepa G,Shrikrishan B.H, Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum in dry adult human skull,Indian journal of anatomy, 2016;5(3).
  20. Patel R, Mehta CD. Morphometric study of Foramen Magnum at the base of human skull in South Gujarat.IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2014;13(6), Ver.IV:23-25.
  21. Jain PC, Tiwari N, Gour KK. Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum in human dry skulls in Central India Region. Indian Journal of Research. 2017;6(2):18-20.
  22. Kizilkanat ED, Boyan N, Soames R, Oguz. Mrphometry of the hypoglossal canal, occipital condyle and foramen magnum. Neurosurg Quarter James Cook Univ 2006;16:121-5.
  23. Avci E, Dagtekin A, Ozturk AH, Kara E, Ozturk NC,Uluc K, et al. Anatomical variations of the foramen magnum, occipital condyle and jugular tubercle. Turk Neurosurg 2011;21:181-90.
  24. Sanjukta Sahoo, Sanjay Kumar Giri et al morphometric Analysis of the foramen magnum and occipital condyles. Int.J.Pharma.Sci.Rev.Res. 2015;33(2):198-204.
  25. Sayee R, Janakiram S, Thomas IM. Foramen magnum measurements of Crania from Karnataka. Journal of Anatomical Society of India. 1987;36:87-89.
  26. Berge JK, Bergman RA. Variations in size and in symmetry of foramina of the human skull. Clin Anat 2001;14:406.
  27. Routal RR, Pal GP, Bhagwat SS, Tamankar BP. Material studies with sexual dimorphism in foramen magnum of human crania. Journal Anat. Soc. Of India 1984;33(2):85-89
  28. Shikha Sharma, Anil Kumar Sharma, Bhawani Shankar Modi , Mohd. Arshad. morphometricevaluation of the foramen magnum and variation in its shape and size: a study on human dried skull. Int J Anat Res 2015;3(3):1399-03. ISSN 2321- 4287.
  29. Govsa F, Ozer MA, Celik S, Ozmutaf NM. Three-dimensional anatomic landmarks of the foramen magnum for the craniovertebral junction.J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1073-6.
  30. Gulsun AKAY,Kahraman GUNGOR,Ilkay PEKER,Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum by using cone beam tomography,Turk J Med Sci 2017;47:1715-1722.
  31. Wanebo J.E, Chicoine M.R. Quantitative analysis of the transcondylar approach to the foramen magnum.Neurosurgery 2001;49:934-41. (discussion 941-3).
  32. Osunwoke EA, Oladipo GS, Gwunireame IU, Ngaokere JO,2012; Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum and jugular foramen in adult skull in southern Nigerian population. Am J Sci Ind Res 2012;3:446-8.
  33. Faazila fathima,K.yuvaraj babu,Evaluating the shape of foramen magnum and overlapping of occipital coindyle on the foramen.Int J Sci Res. 2016;5(9):1078-82.
  34. Manoel C, Prado FB, Caria PHF, Groppo FC. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum in human skulls of brazilian individuals: its relation to gender.Braz. J. Morphol.Sci 2009;26(2):104-108.
  35. Gruber P,Henneberg M, Boni T,Ruhli F.J. variability of foramen magnum size. Anat Rec: 2009;292:1713-19
  36. Berjina farooq,naqshi, Shaheen shahdad,Nida kawoosa, Adil bashir shah. morphological and morphometric study of foramen magnum in dry human skulls of kashmir gjra – global journal for research analysis 2017;6(8):1-3.
  37. Chethan P, Prakash KG, Murlimanju BV, PrashanthKU,Prabhu LV, Saralaya W. et al. Morphological analysis and morphometry of the foramen magnum: an anatomical investigation. Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22:416-9.
  38. Tubbs RS, Griessenauer CJ, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA. Morphometric analysis of the foramen magnum: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2010;66:385-8.
  39. Radhakrishna S.K, Shivarama C.H,Ramkrishna A,Bhagya B,Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum for sex determination in south indian population,NUJHS 2012;2(1):20-22.
  40. Gopalkrishna K, Dr.B.S.Rathna,The craniometric analysis of foramen magnum of Indian population and variation in its dimention,IJAMSCR, 2001;3(2):205-211.
  41. Ganapathy Arthi, Sadeesh T, Sudha Rao,Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum in adult human skull and CT image,Int JCur Res rev, 2014;6(20):11-15.
  42. Anil Kumar, Mitesh Dave, Sanam Anwar. Morphometric Evaluation of Foramen Magnum in Dry Human Skulls. Int J Anat Res 2015;3(2):1015-23.
  43. Ajay R, Kalindi S, Bhavika P,Ojaswini M, Morphometry and sexual dimorphism of human skull foramen magnum, Int J Rec trend sci tech 2015;15(2):379-386.
  44. Raveendranath V, Manjunath K.Y, Umamageshwari amirathlingam,Morphological and morphometric study of variation in shape and size of foramen magnum of human skull. Int j Ana Rad and Surgery, 2018;7(2):A001-A0008.

Cite this article: Bharat.J.Sarvaiya, Shital.Bhishma. Hathila, Jagdish.S.Chaudhari, Nilesh.C.Fichadiya. MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF FORAMEN MAGNUM IN ADULT HUMAN DRY SKULL OF GUJARAT REGION. Int J Anat Res 2018;6(4.1):5797-5802. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2018.345