IJAR.2017.336

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 5; Issue 3.3 (September 2017)

Page No.: 4361-4364

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.336

MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF THE ACROMION PROCESS OF SCAPULA AND ITS CLINICAL IMPORTANCE IN SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION

Vinay G *1, Sheela Sivan 2.

*1 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, M.E.S Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India.

2 Professor and HOD, Department of Anatomy, M.E.S Medical College, Perinthalmanna, Kerala, India.

Corresponding Author: Dr. VINAY G, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF ANATOMY, M.E.S MEDICAL COLLEGE, PERINTHALMANNA – 679338, KERALA, INDIA. Mobile No: +91 – 9844966427

E-Mail: vinayguru82@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

Background: Due to its many variations, scapula became one of the most interesting bones of human skeleton. The acromion process projects forwards almost perpendicularly from the lateral end of spine of scapula. The acromion process is associated with a variety of ailments in the shoulder joint. As morphometry of the Acromion process of the scapula is an important factor implicated in impingement syndrome of the shoulder joint, the purpose of present study is to record the morphometric values of the acromion process and its morphological features in South Indian population.

Methodology: One hundred and sixty-four dry adult scapulae of unknown age and sex belonging to South Indian population were studied. The acromial length, acromial width, acromio-coracoid distance and acromio-glenoid distance were measured using Vernier caliper and recorded in millimeters (mm). Different types of acromion process are also noted.

Results: The mean acromial length was 42.47 ± 4.68 mm, the mean acromial width was 26.57 ± 3.28 mm. The mean acromio-coracoid distance was 34.05 ± 4.94 mm. The average acromio-glenoid distance was 30.05 ± 4.08 mm. The three types of acromion were observed as type – I flat was seen in 37.1%, type II curved in 47.5% and type III hooked in 15.2%.

Conclusion: Knowledge of the morphometric data of acromion process may not only help the surgeons during surgical repair around the shoulder joint but also may be of interest to the anthropologists while studying the evolution of bipedal gait.

Key words: Acromion, Morphometry, Shoulder, Scapula.

REFERENCES

  1. Singh J, Pahuja K, Agarwal R. Morphometric parameters of the acromion process in adult human scapulae. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. Sept 2013;8(2):1165‑
  2. Paraskevas G, Tzaveas A, Papaziogas B, Kitsoulis P, Natsis K, Spanidou S. Morphological parameters of the acromion. Folia Morphologica. 2008;67(4):255–260.
  3. Mansur DI, Khanal K, Haque MK, Sharma K. Morphometry of Acromion Process of Human Scapulae and its Clinical Importance Amongst Nepalese Population. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2012;38(2):33-36.
  4. Edelson JG, Taitz C. Anatomy of the coraco-acromial arch. Relation to degeneration of the acromion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:589–594.
  5. Bigliani LU, Morrison DS, April EW. The morphology of the acromion and rotator cuff impingement (abstr). Orthop Trans. 1986;10:228.
  6. Gupta C, Priya A, Kalthur SG, D Souza AS. A morphometric study of acromion process of scapula and its clinical significance. CHRISMED J Health Res 2014;1:164-9.
  7. Bigliani LU, TicherJB, Flatlow EL, Soslowsky U, Mow VC. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease. Clin Sports Med. 1991;10:823-828.
  8. Anetzberger H, Putz R. The scapula: principles of construction and stress. Acta Anat Basel. 1996;156:70-80.
  9. Coskun N, Karaali K, Cevikol C, Bahadir M. Demirel BM, Sindel M. Anatomical basics and variations of the scapula in Turkish adults. Saudi Med J. 2006;27(9):1320-1325.
  10. Sitha P, Nopparatn S, Aporn CD. The Scapula: Osseous Dimensions and Gender Dimorphism in Thais. Siriraj Hsop Gaz. July 2004;56(7):356-365.
  11. Edelson JG, Taitz C. Anatomy of the coraco-acromial arch. Relation to degeneration of the acromion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:589–594.

Cite this article: Vinay G, Sheela Sivan. MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF THE ACROMION PROCESS OF SCAPULA AND ITS CLINICAL IMPORTANCE IN SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION. Int J Anat Res 2017;5(3.3):4361-4364. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2017.336