IJAR.2017.386

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 5; Issue 4.1 (October 2017)

Page No.: 4510-4518

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.386

PLEISTOCENE HOMININ FOSSIL FEMORA AND HUMERI

Anek R. Sankhyan 1, 2.

1 Ex-Sr. Anthropologist (Physical) & Visiting Fellow, Anthropological Survey of India, Kolkata.

2 President  Palaeo Research Society, IPH Colony, Ghumarwin, H.P., 174021, India.

Address for Correspondence: Dr. Anek R. Sankhyan, President Palaeo Research Society, IPH Colony, Ghumarwin (H.P.) – 174021, India. Phone: +917018436953; E-Mail: arsankhyan@gmail.com.

ABSTRACT

Aim: To report morphometric analysis on six rare fossil femora and three humeri of the Pleistocene prehistoric humans who roamed about the Central Narmada valley (M.P.) during 300,000 to 40,000 years ago.

Methods: Fossils were discovered through intensive explorations and trial excavations. The sites were mapped and shown in their lithostratigraphic contexts. The fossils were cleaned and measured for linear measurements with Mitutoyo Digital caliper for statistical analysis. They were digitally photographed and mCT scanned for detailed morphological observations. The morphometric comparative analysis was done and the segment proportions were used for estimating the statures of the hominins.

Results: The prehistoric femora and humeri display general similarities with their modern counterparts but also variations from the archaic to early modern morphology, especially  in robustness. The statures estimates from the bone segment ratios reveal that most of the Narmada valley humans were ‘short and stocky’ and at par with the Andaman pygmies.

Conclusion: Through the predominant occurrence of the ‘very short and stocky’ Pleistocene hominins it may be postulated that Narmada valley contained common ancestors of the Holocene ‘short-bodied’ populations of Indian mainland, including the pygmies. This conclusion is also supported by recent genomic studies indicating Indian origins of the short-bodied populations and concurs with the “Out of Africa” theory of modern human origins in South Asia.

KEY WORDS: Pleistocene, Fossil Femora, Humeri, Morphometry, Stature, Narmada valley.

REFERENCES

  1. Sonakia A. The skullcap of early man and associated mammalian fauna from Narmada valley alluvium, Hoshangabad area, MP (India). Rec. Geol. Surv. India 1984;113:159–172.
  2. Sankhyan AR. Pleistocene hominins and associated findings from Central Narmada Valley bearing on the evolution of man in South Asia, Ph. D. dissertation, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 2010.
  3. Sankhyan AR. Pleistocene hominin fossil discoveries in India: Implications for human evolution in South Asia. In: Sankhyan, A.R. (Ed.) Recent discoveries and perspectives in human evolution, BAR International Series 2719, England: Archaeopress, 2015; pp. 41-51.
  4. Sankhyan A R. Fossil Clavicle of a middle Pleistocene hominid from the Central Narmada Valley, India. J. Hum. Evol. 1997; 32: 3–16; doi: 10.1006/ jhev. 1996.0117.
  5. Sankhyan A R. A new human fossil find from the Central Narmada basin and its chronology. Curr.Sci., 1997; 73: 1110–1111.
  6. Sankhyan AR. New fossils of Early Stone Age man from Central Narmada Valley. Curr. Sci., 2005; 88: 704–707.
  7. Sankhyan A R, Badam GL, Dewangan LN, Chakraborty S, Prabha S, Kundu S, Chakravarty R. New postcranial hominin fossils from the Central Narmada Valley, India. Advances in Anthropology, 2012; 2 (3):125-131, Published Online August 2012 in SciRes. DOI:10.4236/aa.2012.23015.
  8. Sankhyan A R, Dewangan LN, Chakraborty S, Prabha S, Kundu S, Chakravarty R , Badam GL. New human fossils and associated findings from the Central Narmada. Cur. Sci. 2012;103(12):1-9.
  9. Sankhyan AR. Hominin fossil remains from the Narmada Valley. In: Robbins Schug, G., Walimbe, S. R. (Eds.) A Companion to South Asia in the Past, 1st Edn., New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016; pp.72-85.
  10. Tiwari MP, Bhai HY. Quaternary stratigraphy of the Narmada Valley. Geol. Surv. India, Spl. Publ., 1997; 46: 33–63.
  11. Khan AA, Sonakia A. Quaternary deposits of Narmada with special reference to the hominid fossil. J. Geol. Soc. India, 1992; 39: 147–154.
  12. Rao KV, Chakraborti S, Rao KJ, Ramani MSV, Marathe SD, Borkar BT. 1997, Magnetostratigraphy of Quaternary fluvial sediments and Tephra of Narmada Valley, Central India. Geol. Surv. Ind., Spl. Pub. 1997; 46:65-78.
  13. Acharyya SK, Basu PK. Toba ash on the Indian subcontinent and its implications for the correlation of Late Pleistocene alluvium. Quaternary Res., 1993; 40: 10–19.
  14. Cameron D, Patnaik R, Sahni A. The phylogenetic significance of the Middle Pleistocene Narmada hominin cranium from Central India. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol., 2004; 14: 419–447.
  15. Patnaik R, Chauhan P, Rao R, Blackwell MR, Skinner BAB, Sahni AR, Chauhan MS, Khan HS. New geochronological, paleoclimatological and Paleolithic data from the Narmada Valley hominin locality, Central India. J. Hum. Evol., 2009; 56: 114–133.
  16. Badam GL, Sankhyan AR. Evolutionary trends in Narmada fossil fauna, In Asian Perspectives on Human Evolution (ed. Sankhyan, A. R.), Serials Publications, New Delhi, 2009, pp. 92–102.
  17. Solan S, Kulkarni R. 2013. Estimation of total Length of Femur from Its Fragments in South Indian Population. Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Oct; 7(10): 2111–2115. Published online 2013 Oct 5. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/6275.3465
  18. Kantha L, Kulkarni R. 2014. Estimation of total length of humerus from its fragments in South Indian population. Original Article, International Journal of Anatomy and Research, 2014;2(1):213-20. ISSN 2321- 4287
  19. Jungers WL, Grabowski M, Hatala KG, Richmond BG. The evolution of body size and shape in the human career. Phil. Trans. R. Soc., 2016; B371, 20150247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0247.
  20. Todd RY, Churchill SE. Archaic and modern human distal humeral morphology. J. Hum. Evol., 2006; 51: 603–616; doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.07.006.
  21. Carretero JM, Haile-Selassie Y, Rodríguez R, Arsuaga JL. A partial distal humerus from the Middle Pleistocene deposits at Bodo, Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Anthropol. Sci., 2009; 117:, 19–31; doi:10.1537/ase.070413.
  22. Bermudez de Castro JM et al. Early Pleistocene human Humeri from the Gran Dolina-TD6 site (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 2012; 147: 604–617; doi:10.1002/ajpa.22020.
  23. Kotlia BS, Joshi M. Reconstruction of Late Pleistocene palaeoecology of the Upper Narmada valley (Central India) using fossil communities. Palaeoworld, 2008; 17: 153–159.
  24. Sankhyan AR, Rao VR. Did ancestors of the pygmy or hobbit ever live in Indian heartland? In Recent Advances on Southeast Asian Paleoanthropology and Archeology (ed. Indriati, E.), Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 2007; pp. 76–89.
  25. Van Heteren AH, Sankhyan AR. Hobbits and pygmies: trends in evolution. In Asian Perspectives on Human Evolution (ed. Sankhyan AR), Serials Publications, New Delhi, 2009, pp. 172–187.
  26. Sankhyan AR. The Emergence of Homo sapiens in South Asia: The Central Narmada Valley as Witness. Original scientific paper, Human Biology Review (ISSN 2277 4424), 2013, 2 (2), pp.136-152.
  27. Sankhyan AR, Sahani R. The Andaman Pygmy: Origins and New Adaptations, in Recent Discoveries and Perspectives in Human Evolution (ed. A.R. Sankhyan), BAR International Series 2719, England: Archaeopress, 2015, pp. 161-171.
  28. Barik SS, Sahani R, Prasad BVR, Endicott P et al. Detailed mtDNA genotypes permit a reassessment of the settlement and population structure of the Andaman Islands. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2008; 136: 19–27; doi: 10.1002/ ajpa.20773.
  29. Chandrasekar A, Kumar S, Sreenath J et al. Updating phylogeny of mitochondrial DNA macrohaplogroup M in India: dispersal of modern human in South Asian corridor. PLoS ONE, 2009; 4: 1–13; www.plosone.org
  30. Mondal M. et al. Genomic analysis of the Andamanese provides new insights into the spread of humans in Asia and their local adaptations. Nature Genetics, 2016; published online 25 July 2016; doi:10.1038/ng.3621.

Cite this article: Anek R. Sankhyan. PLEISTOCENE HOMININ FOSSIL FEMORA AND HUMERI. Int J Anat Res 2017;5(4.1):4510-4518. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2017.386