IJAR.2017.443

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 5; Issue 4.3 (December 2017)

Page No.: 4686-4690

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.443

THE COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF CARRYING ANGLE OF ELBOW WITH ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS IN BOTH SEXES

Shahin Kazi 1, Harsha A Keche *2, Prema K Joshi 3, Anjali  N Wanjari 4.

1 Associate Professor , Department  of Anatomy,  A.C.P.M. Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.

*2 Associate Professor , Department  of Anatomy,  A.C.P.M. Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.

3 Associate Professor , Department  of Physiology,  A.C.P.M. Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.

4 Professor, Department  of Anatomy,  A.C.P.M. Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India.

Address for Correspondence: Dr. Harsha A Keche, Associate Professor , Department  of Anatomy,  A.C.P.M. Medical College, Dhule, Maharashtra, India. E-Mail: drharshakeche@rediffmail.com

ABSTRACT

Background: The carrying angle is defined as the acute angle made by the median axis of the arm with the fully extended and supinated forearm. It is important in walking, swinging and carrying objects. Various studies have been done on the cause of the formation of carrying angle. Variations in carrying angle have been reported with age groups, gender and race but little attention has been given to correlate the carrying angle with various anthropological parameters .Hence this study was done to co-relate the carrying angle with various anthropological parameters.

Material and Methods: The present cross sectional observational study was done on 226 students (122 males and 94 females) of age group 17-21 years. A written informed consent was taken. Ethical clearance was taken from institutional ethical committee. The carrying angle of the elbow was measured by goniometer. Height was measured using a stature meter. Arm and forearm length was measured using vernier caliper. Data was statistically analyzed  by “paired- t” test to compare parameters in between paired observations and “unpaired- t” test to compare  groups. The relation between the continuous variables was found by pearson ‘correlation (r) test.

Results – Carrying angle, arm length and forearm length of right side was statistically significantly increased as compared to left side in both males and females. Right hand carrying angle showed no correlation with arm length, forearm length and height in females whereas left hand carrying angle of females and both side carrying angle of males  showed negative correlation with arm length, forearm length and height.

Conclusion – Carrying angle was greater in females than males. The carrying angle was more on the right side than the left side in both sex. Carrying angle showed negative correlation with height and forearm length in both sex.

Key words: Arm length, Carrying angle, Elbow, Forearm length, Height, Sex.

REFERENCES

  1. Ruparelia S, Patel S, Zalawadia A, Shah S, Patel S. Study of carrying angle and its correlation with various parameters. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine. 2010 july-sept;1(3):28-32.
  2. Rajesh B, Reshma VR, Vaithilingam A, Jaene RC, Somasekhar IT. An evaluation of the carrying angle of the elbow joint in adolescents. International Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research 2013 Sept-Dec;2(3):221-225.
  3. Sinnatamby CS. Upper limb. In Last’s anatomy Regional and Applied.11th U.K. Elsevier Churchill Living stone;2006:p 63-66.
  4. Decker GAG, DUPlessis DJ. The elbow.In Lee Mc Gregor’s Synposis of surgical anatomy : 12th Bristol, Great Britain. John Wright and sons; 1986:454-459.
  5. Johanson D. Pectoral girdle, shoulder region and axilla. In Gray’s Anatomy- Anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th Edited by Standring S. U.K.Elsevier Churchill Livingstone;2008:791-822 .
  6. Manoranjitham R, Gosai SR, Arunkumar KR, Shalini R, Parathasarathi R. Study of carrying angle of medical students by using goniometer. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research. 2015 june;4(3):459-466.
  7. Sharma K. Mansur Dl, Khanal K, Haque MK. Variation of carrying angle with age, sex, height and special reference to side. Kathmandu University Medicine Journal 2013;44(4):315-318.
  8. Lim V. Jacob NA, Shahghani MF, Chi wang DL, Devi AK. An Anthropometric study on the carrying angle of elbow among young adults of various ethnicties in Malaysia. NJIRM 2014 Nov-Dec;5(6):20-23.
  9. Bari W, Alam M, Omar S. Goniometry of elbow carrying angle : a comparative clinical study on sexual dimorphism in young males and females. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 2015 Dec;3(12):3482-3484.
  10. Mahajan BK. Methods of Biostatistics. 6th Jaypee Brothers Publications; 2006:127-136.
  11. Patil GV, Apoorva D, Kumar S. Carrying Angle : A morphometric Study in south Indian population. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Health Care, 2014 Dec;1(13):1686 – 1689.
  12. Raichandani L, Sharma K, Kataria KS, Hemkawar J, Raichandani S, Agrawal S. Gonieomertric study of carrying angle and its correlation with various parameter in western rajasthan population. International Journal of Advanced Research and Review,2016;1(5):139-146.
  13. Mangalur V, Karadkhelkar VP, Kshirsagar SV. Sexual dimorphism of carrying angle, International Journal of Recent Trends in Science and Technology 2015 July;15(3):476-478.
  14. Kumari LK, Sekhar RC. A Comparative study of carrying angle between children and adult in Andhra population. IOSK Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences.2016 June;15(6):33-36.

Cite this article: Shahin Kazi, Harsha A Keche, Prema K Joshi, Anjali N Wanjari. THE COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF CARRYING ANGLE OF ELBOW WITH ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS IN BOTH SEXES. Int J Anat Res 2017;5(4.3):4686-4690. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2017.443