IJAR.2024.115
Type of Article: Original Research
Volume 12; Issue 2 (June 2024)
Page No.: 8917-8923
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2024.115
Histological Observations of the Developing Human Fetal Humerus at Different Trimesters of Pregnancy
Prasanna LC 1, Managuli V 2, Bhat KMR *3.
1 Professor, Department of Anatomy, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, MAHE, Manipal, Karnataka, India. ORCiD: 0000-0002-0737-9573
2 Assistant Professor-Senior scale, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal, MAHE, Manipal, Karnataka, India. ORCiD: 000-0003-1593-8897
*3 Additional Professor, Department of Anatomy, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, MAHE, Manipal, Karnataka, India. ORCiD: 0000-0002-2346-6634
Corresponding Author: Dr. Bhat KMR, Additional Professor, Department of Anatomy, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, MAHE, Manipal, Karnataka, India. E-Mail: kumar.bhat@manipal.edu
ABSTRACT
Background: Although femur length is the preferred method for fetal age assessment, the humerus is sometimes the right choice, especially in the second half of pregnancy. Fetal bone development significantly impacts adult bone quality and senescent bone disorders, including osteoporosis.
Purpose of the study: The present study aimed to ascertain the histological changes in the human fetal humerus across the three trimesters. After the institutional ethical committee clearance and parent consent, the study was carried out on stillborn or medically terminated human fetuses from the 10th to the 32nd week of intrauterine life.
Results: First trimester: The primary bone collar appeared with the primary ossification center, marked by more vascular invasion and a pool of mesenchymal cells. Trabeculations begin from the bony collar and insignificant periosteum. Second trimester: The changes showed longitudinal growth of periosteal bone towards the proximal and distal ends of the growing bone. Growth plate with distinguished zones and gradual fusion of epiphysis with growth plate were observed. Third trimester: Trabeculation number and thickness increase with calcification. Towards the third trimester, the marrow cavity with increased and prominent trabeculations is consistent.
Conclusion: Understanding normal microstructural and cellular events chronologically is an ideal platform for future studies to develop cell-based or cell-targeted therapies for adult bone disorders, traumatic bone injuries, or bone engineering.
Keywords: Histology, Developing Bone, Humerus, Fetuses, Embryology.
REFERENCES
[1]. Gao C, Peng S, Feng P, Shuai C. Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells. Bone Res. 2017 Dec 21; 5:17059.
https://doi.org/10.1038/boneres.2017.59
PMid:29285402 PMCid:PMC5738879
[2]. Wiśniewski M, Baumgart M, Grzonkowska M, Małkowski B, Wilińska-Jankowska A, Siedlecki Z, Szpinda M. Ossification center of the humeral shaft in the human fetus: a CT, digital, and statistical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 Oct;39(10):1107-1116.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1849-4
PMid:28357556 PMCid:PMC5610672
[3]. Barreto IS, Cann SL, Ahmed S, Sotiriou V, Turunen MJ, Johansson U, Rodriguez-Fernandez A, Grünewald TA, Liebi M, Nowlan NC, Isaksson H. Multiscale Characterization of Embryonic Long Bone Mineralization in Mice. Advanced Science 2020; 2002524.
[4]. Blumer MJ, Longato S, Richter E, Pérez MT, Konakci KZ, Fritsch H. The role of cartilage canals in endochondral and perichondral bone formation: are there similarities between these two processes? J Anat. 2005 Apr;206(4):359-72.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00404.x
PMid:15817104 PMCid:PMC1571487
[5]. Blumer MJ, Schwarzer C, Pérez MT, Konakci KZ, Fritsch H. Identification and location of bone-forming cells within cartilage canals on their course into the secondary ossification centre. J Anat. 2006 Jun;208(6):695-707.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00578.x
PMid:16761972 PMCid:PMC2100231
[6]. Alvarez J, Costales L, Serra R, Balbín M, López JM. Expression patterns of matrix metalloproteinases and vascular endothelial growth factor during epiphyseal ossification. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Jun;20(6):1011-21.
https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.050204
PMid:15883642
[7]. Gray DJ and Gardner E. The Prenatal Development of the Human Humerus. Am J Anat 1970;129(2): 121-140.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001290202
PMid:5473773
[8]. Asonova SN, Migalkin NS. Use of Masson’s trichrome method for staining decalcified bone tissue]. Arkh Patol. 1996 Jan-Feb;58(1):66-7.
[9]. Prasanna LC, Dada R, Kalthur SG. Difiore’s Atlas of Histology with Functional Correlations, 13 ed, New Delhi: Wolters India Pvt Ltd, 2022.
[10]. Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy. In: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 42nd Edition, Arcturus Publishing; London, 2020.
[11]. Mackie EJ, Ahmed YA, Tatarczuch L, Chen KS, Mirams M. Endochondral ossification: how cartilage is converted into bone in the developing skeleton. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40(1):46-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2007.06.009
PMid:17659995
[12]. Higashikawa A, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Chung U. [Interactions of chondrocytes and osteoblasts during endochondral bone formation]. Clin Calcium. 2006 May;16(5):829-36.
[13]. Putz R. Development and growth of the epiphysis. Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1996 Sep-Oct;134(5):391-5.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1037425
PMid:8967135
[14]. Byers PD and Brown RA. Cell columns in articular cartilage physics questioned: a review. Osteoarthritis Cart 2006; 14(1): P3-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.08.008
PMid:16242356
[15]. Lui JC, Nilsson O, Baron J. Growth plate senescence and catch-up growth. Endocr Dev. 2011; 21:23-29.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000328117
PMid:21865751 PMCid:PMC3420820
[16]. Hardy E, Fernandez-Patron C. Destroy to Rebuild: The Connection Between Bone Tissue Remodeling and Matrix Metalloproteinases. Front Physiol. 2020 Feb 5;11:47.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00047
PMid:32116759 PMCid:PMC7013034
