IJAR.2018.105
Type of Article: Case Study
Volume 6; Issue 1.3 (March 2018)
Page No.: 5034-5037
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2018.105
VARIATIONS IN THE TRIBUTARIES OF INFERIOR VENA CAVA – AN ANATOMICAL STUDY IN 50 CADAVERS
Biswabasi Mohapatra 1, Parimala Sirikonda *2, Sirisha Bandi 3, Abid Ali 4.
1 Professor of Anatomy, Bhaskar Medical College, Hyderabad, Telengana State, India.
*2 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bhaskar Medical College, Hyderabad, Telengana State, India.
3,4 Assistent Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bhaskar Medical College, Hyderabad, Telengana State, India.
Corresponding author: Dr. Parimala Sirikonda, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Bhaskar Medical College, Hyderabad, Telengana State, India. E-Mail: pari.siri@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Objectives: To document the variations in the tributaries of inferior vena cava (IVC) with double common iliac veins, retro aortic renal veins and to establish embryological and clinic-anatomical correlations of such variation.
Materials and Methods: The findings were noted after through and meticulous dissection of the abdomen of 50 cadavers in the department of Anatomy, Bhaskar Medical College, India. Photographic documentation of the variation was also made.
Results: Variations were reported in 2 cadavers.
1) In one cadaver the left renal vein, after its origin from the kidney passed obliquely behind the abdominal aorta, joined the IVC at the level of 3rd lumber vertebra below the attachment of right crus of diaphragm. Left renal artery was normal in position.
2) In another cadaver, there was a communication between the right internal and external iliac veins at the pelvic brim anterior to the sacroiliac joint. From there two right common iliac veins, one appeared as continuation of internal iliac vein(common iliac vein I) and the other as a continuation of external iliac vein (common iliac vein II) ran upwards to join the IVC.
Conclusion: The variation can be explained in the light of embryological development. In addition, knowledge of such variation is important for carrying out surgical procedures in the abdomen.
Key words: Inferior vena cava, common iliac vein, retro aortic renal vein, abdominal aorta.
REFERENCES
- Susan standring Harold Ellis, Jeremiah c Healy et al. Gray’s Anatomy, The Anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39th. London Churchill Livingstone 2011. P.1120.
- Edwards WR. Hysterectomy, massive transfusion and packing to control haemorrhage from pelvic veins in the course of bilateral oophorectomy. Aust N Z J obstetric Gynaecol. 1996;36:82-84.
- Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM. Structures at risk from medically placed acetabular screcus. J Bone joint surg Am. 1990;72:509-511.
- Artico D, Lorenzini P, Mancini P, Gobbi S, Cartois V. David. Radiological evidence of anatomical variation of the inferior vena cava; Report of two cases. Surgical and Radiological Anatomy 2004;26:153-156.
- Clovis Luis Konopka, Mercelo Salame, Georgia Andrade Padulla, Raquel Rodrigues Muradas, Julio Cesar Batistella; Agenesis of inferior vena cava associated with deep venous thrombosis, J Vasc Bras 2010;9:196-199.
- Dong-soo kyung, Jae-Ho Lee, Deuk –yong shin et al. Double retro aortic renal vein,anatomy and cell biology.2012;1-3.
- Mayo J ,Gray R, St Louis E et al. Anomalies of the inferior vena cava. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;140:339-345.
- Kellman GM, ALpern MB, Sndler MA, et al. computed tomography of vena caval anomalies with embryologic correlation. Radiographics. 1988;8:533-56.
- Kottra JJ, Castellino RA. The circumaortic left renal vein . Radiology; 1970;95:141-143.
- Peter L, Willams Lawrence H, Bannister Martin M, Berry patrica Collins Mary Dyson Jullian E, Dussek Mark. W. J. Ferguson, “Gray’s Anatomy”,Embryonic circulation, 38th edition,Churchill Livingstone, London, 1999; p 324-325
- Royal SA, Callen PW. CT evalution of anomalies of the inferior vena cava and left renal vein. AJR Am J Roentgenol.1979;132:759-63.
- Walker TG, Geller SC, Delmonico FL et al; Donor renal angiography:its influence on the decision to use the right or left kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:1149-1151.