IJAR.2018.306

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 6; Issue 3.3 (Septmber 2018)

Page No.: 5660-5666

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2018.306

MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF PEDICLES OF DRIED ADULT HUMAN LUMBAR VERTEBRAE IN UDAIPUR ZONE

Lokesh Choubisa 1, Hitesh Babel *2.

1 M.Sc. (Medical Anatomy) Final Year Student, Department of Anatomy, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.

*2 Professor and Head, Department Of Anatomy, Gujarat Adani Institute Of Medical Sciences, Bhuj, Gujarat, India.

Corresponding Author: Dr. Hitesh Babel, Professor and Head, Department Of Anatomy, Gujarat Adani Institute Of Medical Sciences, Bhuj, Gujarat, India. E-Mail: hit_19c@rediffmail.com

ABSTRACT:

Introduction: It has been suggested that reduced inter-pedicular distance is one of the cause of primary narrowing of the spinal canal may lead to low back pain.Transpedicular approaches are being widely used in many surgeries such as bone biopsy, bone grafting, Pedicle screw fixation, vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. The morphometric data of lumbar vertebra from Udaipur district i.e. in southern Rajasthan is to the best of our knowledge, virtually unexplored so we under took this study.

Aims and objectives: The present study aims at determining the morphometric norms of Pedicle of the lumbar vertebra in Udaipur zone measured in dried bone. In this study the following measurements on Pedicle of lumbar vertebra are taken i.e. pedicle height, pedicle width and  Interpedicular distance.

Materials and methods: The present study was done on the 110 dry adult human lumbar vertebrae from various medical colleges of Udaipur. The morphometrical data of the Pedicle of human lumbar vertebrae were measured and analysed.  Digital vernier calliper was used to measure the morphometric data.

Result and discussion: The pedicle height of Pedicle decreased from L1 to L5 except in L2 and width of Pedicle increased from L1 to L5. Interpedicular distanced gradually increased from L1 to L5.

Key words: Lumbar Vertebra, Pedicle Length, Pedicle Width, Interpedicular Distance, Pedicle Screw Fixation.

REFERENCE

  1. Nelson, M.A. Lumbar canal Stenosis. J. of bone & joint surgery: 1973;55b(3):506-512.
  2. Pal GP, Routal RV. Transmission of weight through the lower thoracic and lumbar regions of the vertebral column in man. J. Anat. 1987;152:93-105.
  3. Standring S (editor-in-chief) et al. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. In: The Back. 39th edition. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005;748-749.
  4. Hsiang JK, Furman MB; Spinal Stenosis. Available from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1913265
  5. Wankhede HA, Jadhav SS, Katti AS, Herekar NG, Morphometric study of the pedicle of the dried adult human lumbar vertebrae. International Journal of Anatomy Physiology and Biochemistry.2014;1(1):1-5.
  6. Gaines RW Jr . The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82-A(10):1458-76.
  7. Elster AD Bertolotti’s syndrome revisited. Transitional vertebrae of the lumbar spine. Spine 1989;14(12):1373-7.
  8. Zafer Yuksel, M.D. Asoc. Prof., Murvet Yuksel, Vedat Nacitarhan. Yakup Gümüsalan., Serhat Kayiran., “Pedicle Morphometry in Subjects with Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra: Relation to Pedicle Screw Fixation” Science Journal of Medicine and Clinical Trials, Volume 2013, Article ID sjmct-245, 9 Pages, 2013, doi: 10.7237/sjmct/245.
  9. Amonoo-Kuofi HS. Age-related variations in the horizontal and vertical diameters of the Pedicles of the lumbar spine. J Anat. Apr 1995; 186(2):321-328.
  10. Arora L, Dada R, Singh V. Morphometric study of lumbar Pedicles in Delhi region of Northern India. Indian Journal of Practicing Doctor 2006; 3(5).
  11. AyhanAttar,HasanCaglarUgur, Aysun Uzetal.Lumbar pedicle: surgical anatomic valuation and relationships. Eur Spine J 2001;10:10–15.DOI 10.1007/s005860000198
  12. Chawala K, Sharma M, Abhaya A, Kochhar S. Morphometry of the lumbar Pedicle inNorth West India. Eur J Anat 2011;15(3):155-161.
  13. Dhaval K. Patil , Pritha S. Bhuiyan et al. A morphometric study of the Pedicles of dry human typical lumbar Vertebrae. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research: June 2014;3(3):428-433.
  14. Patel JP,Dr. Chauhan JM, Dr. Nirvana AB, Dr. shah RK, Dr. Pensi CA, Dr. Dave RV. National journal of integrated research in medicine. 2012;3(2):61-64.
  15. Marasini RP, Gautam P, Sherchan B, et al. A morphometric study of lumbar spine pedicles in Nep-alese population. JCMS Nepal 2014;10(4):12-7.
  16. Prakash, Prabhu LV, Vadgaonkar R, Pai MM, Ranade AV, Singh G. Morphometry of Vertebral Pedicles: a Comprehensive Anatomical Studyin the Lumbar Region. Int J. Morphol 2007; 25(2):393-406.
  17. Singh J, Pahuja K, Khatri J. Morphometric analysis of the lumbar vertebrae in North Indian Population. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences. 2013; 3 (4): 830-834.
  18. Singel TC, Patel MM, Gohil DV. A study of width and height of lumbar Pedicles in Saurashtra region. J. Anat. Soc. India. 2004; 53(1):4-9.
  19. Seema, Verma P, Singh M. MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF PEDICLES OF THE LUMBAR VERTEBRAE IN ADULT PUNJABI MALES. Int J Anat Res 2016;4(2):2401-2404. DOI: 16965/ijar.2016.209
  20. Tiwari A, Pandey S, Naik DC. A study of height and width of typical lumbar pedicles in relation to mechanical load. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2015;4:275-278.
  21. Vinay KV, Vishal K. A study of transverse diameter of the lumbar spinal canal in normal South Indians using CR-35X digitizer. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences 2012; 2(2):30-35.
  22. Kapoor Y, Anil. R. Sherke, Krishnaiah.M, et al Morphometry of the Lumbar Vertebrae and its Clinical Significance. Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2014; 2(3C):1045-1052.Kapoor Y, Anil. R. Sherke, Krishnaiah.M, et al Morphometry of the Lumbar Vertebrae and its Clinical Significance. Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2014; 2(3C):1045-1052.

Cite this article: Lokesh Choubisa, Hitesh Babel. MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF PEDICLES OF DRIED ADULT HUMAN LUMBAR VERTEBRAE IN UDAIPUR ZONE. Int J Anat Res 2018;6(3.3):5660-5666. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2018.306