IJPR.2022.105

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 10; Issue 2 (April 2022)

Page No.: 4145-4149

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2022.105

Effect of Computer Use on Tactile Perception and Dexterity of Hand in Frequent Computer Users

Swati Kubal 1, Himanshi Thaker*2.

1 Assistant Professor, Physiotherapy school and centre, Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

*2  Intern, Physiotherapy School and Centre, Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Corresponding author: Himanshi Thaker,  Intern, Physiotherapy School and Centre, Topiwala National Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. E-Mail: himanshithaker@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Context: Frequent use of computer involves repetitive tasks of hand. As previous studies imply that repetitive tasks lead to degeneration of the sensory representation of the hand and thus have an effect on sensory motor functions of hand.

Aims: The present study aimed to find out the effect of computer use on tactile perception and dexterity of hand in frequent computer users.

Settings and Design: The study was cross-sectional, analytic study conducted at the physiotherapy O.P.D. at a tertiary care hospital. Forty adults participated in the study recruited on the basis of computer use. There were 20 frequent users (≥2hours/day, ≥12 months) and 20 occasional users (<2hours/day, <12 months).

Methods and Material: Tactile perception was assessed by two point orientation discrimination test using an aesthesiometer and dexterity of hand was assessed by grooved pegboard test using a grooved pegboard.

Statistical analysis used: Unpaired t test or Mann Whitney U test was performed according to the distribution of the data in each group.

Results: The study showed significant difference for Two point orientation discrimination test in dominant hand (P=0.0033 for thenar and P=0.0043 for hypothenar) and non-dominant hand (P=0.0016 for thenar and P=0.0100 for hypothenar). There was no significant difference for Grooved pegboard test in frequent computer users when compared with occasional users.

Conclusions: The present study gives evidence that early signs of deficits occur in people exposed to repetitive computer tasks.

Key words: Computer Use, Repetitive Tasks, Hand Functions, Tactile Perception, Dexterity.

REFERENCES

[1]. Karen Jacobs. Ergonomics for Therapists. 2nd Edition. Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. 2008.
[2]. Rempel D, Tittiranonda P, Burastero S, Hudes M, So Y. Effect of keyboard keyswitch design on hand pain. J Occup Environ Med. 1999;41(2):111-119.
[3]. Griffiths KL, Mackey MG, Adamson BJ, Pepper KL. Prevalence and risk factors for musculoskeletal symptoms with computer based work across occupations. Work. 2012;42(4):533-541.
[4]. Tittiranonda P, Burastero S, Rempel D. Risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders among computer users. Occup Med. 1999;14(1):17-iii.
[5]. Shavlovskaia OA, Shvarkov SB, Posokhov SI. Hand motor dysfunctions in computer users. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2010;110(9):22-26.
[6]. Tremblay F, Mireault AC, Létourneau J, Pierrat A, Bourrassa S. Tactile perception and manual dexterity in computer users. Somatosens Mot Res. 2002;19(2):101-108.
[7]. Byl NN, Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM. A primate genesis model of focal dystonia and repetitive strain injury: I. Learning-induced dedifferentiation of the representation of the hand in the primary somatosensory cortex in adult monkeys. Neurology. 1996;47(2):508-520.
[8]. Byl NN1, Melnick M. The neural consequences of repetition: clinical implications of a learning hypothesis. J Hand Ther. 1997 Apr-Jun;10(2):160-74.
[9]. Byl N, Hamati D, Melnick M, Wilson F, McKenzie A. The sensory consequences of repetitive strain injury in musicians: focal dystonia of the hand. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 1996;7(1):27-39.
[10]. Van Boven RW. Spatial discrimination is abnormal in focal hand dystonia. Neurology. 2001;57(2):370.
[11]. Mahendra N Parikh, Avijit Hazra, Joydev Mukherjee, Nithya Gogtay. Research Methodology Simplified: Every Clinician a Researcher. 1st edition. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, 2010.
[12]. Dikmen SS, Heaton RK, Grant I, Temkin NR. Test-retest reliability and practice effects of expanded Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1999;5(4):346-356.
[13]. Tong J, Mao O, Goldreich D. Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:579. Published 2013 Sep 13.
[14]. Bryden PJ, Roy EA. A new method of administering the Grooved Pegboard Test: performance as a function of handedness and sex. Brain Cogn. 2005;58(3):258-268.
[15]. Thonnard J, Saels P, Van den Bergh P, Lejeune T. Effects of chronic median nerve compression at the wrist on sensation and manual skills. Exp Brain Res. 1999;128(1-2):61-64.
[16]. René Pelletier, Daniel Bourbonnais, Johanne Higgins, Maxime Mireault, Michel Alain Danino, Patrick G. Harris. Left Right Judgement Task and Sensory, Motor, and Cognitive Assessment in Participants with Wrist/Hand Pain. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2018, Article ID 1530245, 13 pages.

Cite this article: Swati Kubal, Himanshi Thaker.  Effect of Computer Use on Tactile Perception and Dexterity of Hand in Frequent Computer Users. Int J Physiother Res 2022;10(2):4145-4149. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2022.105