https://www.ijmhr.org/ijpr.html editor_physiotherapy@hotmail.com
ISSN:       2321-1822 (E) 2321-8975 (P)

IJPR.2018.115

DOWNLOAD PDF
Table of Contents

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 6; Issue 3 (May 2018)

Page No.: 2701-2704

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2018.115

DETERMINATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIME IN INDIVIDUALS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS

Pooja Shankar *1, Manali S. Desai1, Priyanka Honkalas 2, Ajay Kumar 3.

*1 Intern- DPO’S NETT College of physiotherapy. Affiliated to Maharashtra University of health sciences, Nashik.

1 Assistant Professor Musculoskeletal department – DPO’S NETT College of physiotherapy. Affiliated to Maharashtra University of health sciences, Nashik.

2 Assistant Professor – DPO’S NETT College of physiotherapy. Affiliated to Maharashtra University of health sciences, Nashik.

3 Professor – DPO’S NETT College of physiotherapy. Affiliated to Maharashtra University of health sciences, Nashik.

Corresponding Author Address: Pooja Shankar, Intern- DPO’S NETT College of physiotherapy. Affiliated to Maharashtra University of health sciences, Nashik, Maharashtra, India. E-Mail: pooja.shankar298@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cervical spondylosis is a common degenerative condition of the spine that is on a rise. Owing to the chronic pathology of the condition, the proprioceptive and kinaesthetic receptors are affected. Appropriate and accurate response to various stimuli in the space requires timely reactions. Due to the changes in these receptors, reaction time maybe prolonged in individuals.

Objectives: To determine simple reaction time in individuals with cervical spondylosis and normal. To compare the simple reaction time among the normal and cervical spondylosis subjects.

Material and methods: Design-Experimental study on 50 individuals with cervical spondylosis and 50 normal subjects between the ages of 30-50yrs of age. Materials- A computer software that is the deary liewald reaction time task (Version-3.1, Reliability- 0.94) to measure simple reaction time (SRT). Two practise trails and 20 real time reaction was collected in ms and used for statistical analysis.

Results: There was a significant statistical difference in the mean reaction time between the normal (290.72ms) and cervical spondylosis (486.78ms) individuals using Unpaired t-test (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The study concluded that there is a significant increase in the simple reaction time of cervical spondylosis individuals

Key words: cervical spondylosis, simple reaction time, deary liewald reaction time tester.

REFERENCES

  1. Chauling Wang, Fuming Tian: The incidence of cervical spondylosis decreases with aging in the elderly, and increases with aging in the young and adult population: A hospital-based clinical analysis; Clinical intervention aging 2016;11:43-47.
  2. Ravi Shankar Reddy, Arun Maiya G, Sharath Kumar Rao: Proprioceptive reposition errors in subjects with cervical spondylosis; International Journal of Health Sciences and Research 2012;1(2):65-72.
  3. Pamela K. Levangie and Cynthia C. Norkin: Joint structure and function, A comprehensive analysis; Fourth edition; Chapter no.4; Page no. 161
  4. Rix GD, Baquest J: Cervicocephalic kinaesthetic sensibility in patients with chronic, nontraumatic cervical pain; Arch Phys Med Rehabil Jul 2001; 82(7):911-9.
  5. Gregory GP, common vertebral joint problems. 2nd edition, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburg, London, Melbourne and New York 1998.
  6. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI, Burke D: Kinaesthetic signals and muscle contraction. Trends in Neurosciences 1992;15:62–5.
  7. Jarolaw P, Grod DC, Peter R: Effect of neck pain on verticality perception, Arch Phys Med Rehab,2002;83:236-40.
  8. Lees, J. W. Aldren Turner: Natural history and prognosis; British Medical Journal 1963:1607-161.
  9. Srirangam Kumaresan, Narayan Yoganandan: Contribution of disc degeneration to osteophyte formation in the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation; Journal of orthopaedic research 2001;19:977-984.
  10. Revel M, Deshays A, Minguet M: Cervicocephalic kinesthesia sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Arch Physical Med Rehab 1991;72:288-91.
  11. Allan I. Binder: Cervical Spondylosis and Neck Pain; BMJ: British Medical Journal 2007;33:527-531.
  12. Michel Revel, Marc Minguet et al: Changes in cervicocephalic kinesthesia after a proprioceptive rehabilitation program in patients with neck pain: a randomized controlled study; Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:895-899.
  13. Rand M. Voorhies MD: Cervical spondylosis : recognition, differential diagnosis, and management; Ochsner J 2001,
  14. Bruce M. McCormack and Phillip R. Weinstein: Cervical spondylosis: an update; West J Med. 1996;165:43-51
  15. Ribot-Ciscar E, Roll JP: Ago-antagonist muscle spindle inputs contribute together to joint movement coding in man. Brain Research 1998;791:167–76.
  16. Anderson JS, Hsu AW, Vasavada AN: Morphology, architecture and Biomechanics of human cervical multifidus. Spine 2005;30:E86–91.
  17. Ricarda Lechner Martin Thaler Martin Krismer  Christian Haid: Driving reaction time before and after anterior cervical fusion for disc herniation: a preliminary study. Eur Spine J.2013;22(7):1517-1521.
  18. Ghuntla T et al A Comparative Study of Visual Reaction Time in Basketball Players and Healthy Controls NJIRM 2012;3(1):49-51.
  19. Prafulla R Chandak, Jayant Makwana: Ageing & Reaction time in Indian Population. People’s journal of scientific research 2012;5:36-39.
  20. Batra et al: A comparative study between young and adult indian males on audio-visual reaction time; Ind. J. Sci. Res and Tech 2014;2(1):24-29
  21. Deary, Liewald & Nissan: A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: The Deary-Liewald reaction time task. Behaviour Research Methods 2011;43:258-268.

Cite this article: Pooja Shankar, Manali S. Desai, Priyanka Honkalas, Ajay Kumar. DETERMINATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIME IN INDIVIDUALS WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS. Int J Physiother Res 2018;6(3):2701-2704. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2018.115
Post Views: 0