IJPR.2021.126
Type of Article: Original Research
Volume 9; Issue 3 (June 2021)
Page No.: 3843-3847
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2021.126
Effect of flow and volume-oriented incentive spirometer exercise on the hemodynamic parameters in cardiac surgery patients. Pilot interventional study
Pranjal Keny *1, Rajani Pagare 2.
*1 Student BPT, Deccan Education Society’s Brijlal Jindal College of Physiotherapy, Pune, India.
2 Professor and HOD (Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiotherapy), Deccan Education Society’s Brijlal Jindal College of Physiotherapy, Pune, India.
Address for correspondence: Pranjal Keny, 3/185, Raj Mahal, Rd 28-A, near Municipal school, Sion (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Pin Code- 400 022. E-Mail: kenypranjal@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Background: The 2 types of incentive spirometers (flow and volume-oriented) prescribed after cardiac surgery demonstrate a difference in the pattern of breathing, diaphragm mobility, pulmonary function test. Limited research is available on the effect of incentive spirometer on hemodynamic parameters.
Purpose: To provide hemodynamic perspective for preference of a specific type of incentive spirometer after cardiac surgery.
Method: Ideal method of performing breathing on their prescribed incentive spirometer was explained. On 2nd day post surgery, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation and blood pressure were noted immediately before and after performing 8 breaths on the incentive spirometer.
Results: The intergroup comparison i.e., the difference between changes caused by flow and volume-oriented incentive spirometers are statistically insignificant. The intra group comparison, the changes in hemodynamic parameters by flow and volume-oriented incentive spirometers are statistically insignificant, except for heart rate with flow-oriented incentive spirometers showed a statistically significant increase.
Conclusions: There is no difference in the impact of flow-oriented and volume-oriented Incentive spirometers on hemodynamic parameters in post-cardiac surgery patients.
Key words: Incentive spirometer, Cardiac surgery, Heart rate, Blood pressure, Respiratory Rate, Oxygen saturation.
REFERENCES
[1]. Upendra Kaul & Vineet Bhatia. Perspective on coronary interventions & cardiac surgeries in India. Indian J Med Res, 2010; 132(suppl 5):543-548.
[2]. Prabhakaran D, Jeemon P, Roy A. Cardiovascular Diseases in India: Current Epidemiology and Future Directions. Circulation, 2016; 133(Suppl 16):1605-20.
[3]. Adam E M Eltorai, Grayson L Baird, Ashley Szabo Eltorai, et al. Perspectives on Incentive Spirometry Utility and Patient Protocols. Respiratory Care, 2018; 63 (Suppl 5):519-531.
[4]. Wilkins RL, Stoller JK, Kacmarek RM. Lung expansion therapy. In Egan’s fundamentals of respiratory care, 9th edition. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009:903-920.
[5]. Gopala Krishna Alaparthi, Alfred Joseph Augustine, Anand R, Ajith Mahale. Comparison of flow and volume-oriented incentive spirometry on lung function and diaphragm movement after laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomized clinical pilot trial. International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research, Int J Physiother Res, 2013; 1 (Suppl 5):274-78.
[6]. Denise de Moraes Paisani, Cibele Cristine Berto Marques Da Silva, Adriana Claudia Lunardi, et al. Comparison of incentive spirometers on thoracoabdominal mechanics and inspiratory muscular activation in morbidly obese. European Respiratory Journal, 2012; 40:1183.
[7]. Cairo JM. Mosby’s respiratory care equipment. Elsevier: Health Sciences; 2013.
[8]. Jennifer L. Reed, Angelica Z. Blais, Marja-Leena Keast, et al. Performance of Fixed Heart Rate Increment Targets of 20 vs 30 Beats per Minute for Exercise Rehabilitation Prescription in Outpatients with Heart Failure. Clinical research, 2017; 33 (Suppl 6):777-784.
[9]. Josef Weindler, Ralph-Thomas Kiefer. The Efficacy of Postoperative Incentive Spirometry Is Influenced by the Device Specific Imposed Work of Breathing. CHEST 2001; 119:1858-1864.
[10]. Adriana Lunardi, Desiderio Parras, Renata, Denise Paisani, Cibele Marques, Clarice Tanaka, Celso Carvalho. Effect of volume orientated versus flow orientated incentive spirometry on chest wall volume, inspiratory muscle activity and thoracic-abdominal synchrony in elderly. Respiratory Care 2014; 59(Suppl 3):420-426.
[11]. Charles Weissman, MD. Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Surgery. Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2004; 8 (Suppl 3):185–211.
[12]. Kathy Stiller, Joseph Montarello, Malcolm Wallace, Meredith Dajf, Ruth Grant, Sue Jenkins, Bob Hall, Helen Yates. Efficacy of breathing and coughing exercises in the prevention of pulmonary complications after coronary artery surgery. Chest,1994; 105 (Suppl 3):741-747.
[13]. V. F. Parriera, G.M. Tornich, RR Britto, R.F Sampaio. Assessment of tidal volume and thoracic-abdominal motion using volume and flow orientated spirometers in healthy subjects. Brazil J Med Biol Res. 2005; 38(Suppl 7):1105-12.
[14]. Nenad Lakusic, Darija Mahovic, Peter Kruzliak, et al. Changes in Heart Rate Variability after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Clinical Importance of These Findings. BioMed research international 2015; 10:1155-7
[15]. Bauernschmitt R, et al. Impairment of cardiovascular autonomic control in patients early after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2004; 25(Suppl 3):320-6.
[16]. Ruben Restrepo, Richard Wettstein, Leo Wittnebel, Michael Tracy. Incentive spirometry:2011. Respi Care 2011; 56(Suppl 10):1600-1604.
