IJPR.2021.201

Type of Article:  Original Research

Volume 10; Issue 1 (February 2022)

Page No.: 4088-4094

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijpr.2021.201

Evaluation Of Average Length of Follow-Up Duration Post Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Survey

Pranjali Natu 1, Diptee Bhole *2.

1 Physiotherapist, DES’ Brijlal Jindal College of Physiotherapy, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8718-5006

*2 Associate Professor, DES’ Brijlal Jindal College of Physiotherapy, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6447-2547

Address for Correspondence:   Dr Diptee Bhole (PT)*, Associate Professor, DES’ Brijlal Jindal College of Physiotherapy, Pune, Maharashtra, India. E-Mail: diptee.bhole@despune.org

ABSTRACT

Background: Among the various diseases in the world, osteoarthritis (OA) is a major contributing factor of disability. Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely performed procedure for advanced arthritis of the knee joint. Both subjective and objective assessments are necessary to evaluate the outcomes post TKA. The physiotherapy treatment program following the surgery is designed in a manner which is best suitable to the patient’s need, the efficacy of which will only be determined with regular follow up sessions.

Objectives: The primary objective is to find out length of duration of follow up sessions post TKA with the Physiotherapist. The secondary objectives are to determine whether the reason for termination of follow-up is physiotherapist-based or patient-based and to determine whether the discharge criteria are based on measurable assessment tools.

Purpose: In spite of the surgery being routinely performed, records of time period of follow up with the surgeons and physiotherapists are not maintained. It is also not documented whether the discharge occurs on the basis of formal functional assessments.

Methodology: Pilot study was performed on a group of 10 physiotherapists to calculate the sample size. It was found to be 73. For the final study, candidates fitting in the inclusion criteria were chosen. Oral consent was taken. Self-designed questionnaire in the form of “Google-Form” was administered. The candidates were requested to fill the same. Descriptive analysis of the data obtained was performed to find out the average duration of follow-up post Total Knee Arthroplasty using PRISM Graph-Pad software.

Results: Average (median) length of follow-up duration post TKA was found to be 6.000 weeks. Furthermore, the termination criteria of follow-up were more physiotherapist based and objective in nature.

Conclusion: The time period of follow-up post TKA is inconsistent with the minimum period required for optimal functional recovery of various clinical parameters.

Clinical Implication: A standardized protocol of follow-up post TKA must be devised. The decision making process of termination of follow-up which is based on measurable tools of assessment should be in line with current research findings.

Key words: Total Knee Arthroplasty, Follow-up, Functional Recovery.

REFERENCES

[1]. Samuel AJ, Kanimozhi D. Outcome measures used in patient with knee osteoarthritis: With special importance on functional outcome measures. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2019;13(1):52–60.
[2]. Lynn Allen Colby, Carolyn Kisner , John DeWitt. The Knee- Joint surgery and Post-operative management. In: Therapeutic Exercise- Foundation and Techniques. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical; 2012. p. 778.
[3]. Pachore JA, Vaidya SV, Thakkar CJ, Bhalodia HK, Wakankar HM. ISHKS joint registry: A preliminary report. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47(5):4103 0019–5413 118208.
[4]. Canovas F, Dagneaux L. Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Feb;104(1S):S41-S46.
[5]. Liao CD, Lin LF, Huang YC, Huang SW, Chou LC, Liou TH. Functional outcomes of outpatient balance training following total knee replacement in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Sep;29(9):855-67.
[6]. Ha CW, Park YB, Song YS, Kim JH, Park YG. Increased Range of Motion Is Important for Functional Outcome and Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Asian Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jun;31(6):1199-1203.
[7]. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Snyder-Mackler L. Quadriceps strength and the time course of functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Jul;35(7):424-36.
[8]. Barker KL, Jenkins C, Pandit H, Murray D. Muscle power and function two years after unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee. 2012;19(4):360–4.
[9]. Vahtrik D, Gapeyeva H, Ereline J, Pääsuke M. Relationship between leg extensor muscle strength and knee joint loading during gait before and after total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21(1):216–20.
[10]. Bolink SAAN, Grimm B, Heyligers IC. Patient-reported outcome measures versus inertial performance-based outcome measures: A prospective study in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2015;22(6):618–23.
[11]. Graff C, Hohmann E, Bryant AL, Tetsworth K. Subjective and objective outcome measures after total knee replacement: is there a correlation? ANZ J Surg. 2016 Nov;86(11):921-925.
[12]. Gandhi R, Mahomed NN, Cram P, Perruccio AV. Understanding the relationship between 3-month and 2-year pain and function scores after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(5):1368–72.
[13]. Lenguerrand E, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Sayers A, Brunton L, Beswick AD, et al. Trajectories of pain and function after primary hip and knee arthroplasty: The ADAPT cohort study. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149306.
[14]. Wylde V, Penfold C, Rose A, Blom AW. Variability in long-term pain and function trajectories after total knee replacement: A cohort study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(7):1345–50.
[15]. Brandes M, Ringling M, Winter C, Hillmann A, Rosenbaum D. Changes in physical activity and health-related quality of life during the first year after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(3):328–34.
[16]. Papakostidou I, Dailiana ZH, Papapolychroniou T, Liaropoulos L, Zintzaras E, Karachalios TS, et al. Factors affecting the quality of life after total knee arthroplasties: a prospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13(1):116.
[17]. Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty: are patients’ expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up: A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(1):55–61.
[18]. Lošťák J, Gallo J, Zapletalová J. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of pre-operative and Peri-operative parameters influencing results in 826 patients. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016;83(2):94–101.
[19]. March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley H, Brnabic AJ, Tribe KL, Bachmeier CJ, et al. Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients’ quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms. Med J Aust. 1999;171(5):235–8.
[20]. Barker KL, Jenkins C, Pandit H, Murray D. Muscle power and function two years after unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee. 1016;2012;19(4):360-364.
[21]. Nerhus TK, Heir S, Svege I, Skråmm I, Jervidalo T, Madsen JE, et al. Time-dependent improvement in functional outcome following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A prospective longitudinal multicenter study involving 96 patients: A prospective longitudinal multicenter study involving 96 patients. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(1):46–52.
[22]. Vahtrik D, Gapeyeva H, Ereline J, Pääsuke M. Relationship between leg extensor muscle strength and knee joint loading during gait before and after total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 1016;2014;21(1):216-220.
[23]. Yoshida Y, Mizner RL, Ramsey DK, Snyder-Mackler L. Examining outcomes from total knee arthroplasty and the relationship between quadriceps strength and knee function over time. Clin Biomech (Bristol. 1016;Aon). 2008;23(3):320-328.
[24]. Stevens-Lapsley JE, Balter JE, Wolfe P, Eckhoff DG, Kohrt WM. Early neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve quadriceps muscle strength after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012;92(2):210–26.
[25]. Nerhus TK, Heir S, Thornes E, Madsen JE, Ekeland A. Time-dependent improvement in functional outcome following LCS rotating platform knee replacement: A prospective longitudinal study in 50 patients. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(6):727–32.
[26]. Mehta S, Rigney A, Webb K, Wesney J, Stratford PW, Shuler FD, et al. Characterizing the recovery trajectories of knee range of motion for one year after total knee replacement. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020;36(1):176–85.
[27]. Schwartz I, Kandel L, Sajina A, Litinezki D, Herman A, Mattan Y. Balance is an important predictive factor for quality of life and function after primary total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(6):782–6.
[28]. Bączkowicz D, Skiba G, Czerner M, Majorczyk E. Gait and functional status analysis before and after total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2018 Oct;25(5):888-896.
[29]. ISHKS [Internet]. Ishks.com. [cited 2021 May 26]. Available from: http://www.ishks.com][30]. Yang HY, Losina E, Lange JK, Katz JN, Collins JE. Longitudinal Trajectories of Pain and Function Improvement Following Total Knee Replacement. ACR Open Rheumatol. 1002;2019;1(5):308-317.
[31]. Medical Advisory Secretariat. Physiotherapy rehabilitation after total knee or hip replacement: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(8):1–91.
[32]. Warren M, Kozik J, Cook J, Prefontaine P, Ganley K. A comparative study to determine functional and clinical outcome differences between patients receiving outpatient direct physical therapy versus home physical therapy followed by outpatient physical therapy after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs. 2016;35(6):382–90.
[33]. Akodu AK, Giwa SO, Akinbo SRA, Ahmed UA. Physiotherapy in the management of total knee arthroplasty: a review. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2011;21(2):99–105.
[34]. Lenssen AF, de Bie RA. Role of physiotherapy in peri-operative management in total knee and hip surgery. Injury. 2006;37 Suppl 5:S41-3.
[35]. Grotle M, Garratt AM, Klokkerud M, Løchting I, Uhlig T, Hagen KB. What’s in team rehabilitation care after arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? Results from a multicenter, longitudinal study assessing structure, process, and outcome. Phys Ther. 2010;90(1):121–31.
[36]. Mahomed NN, Koo Seen Lin MJ, Levesque J, Lan S, Bogoch ER. Determinants and outcomes of inpatient versus home based rehabilitation following elective hip and knee replacement. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(7):1753–8.
[37]. Kramer JF, Speechley M, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Vaz M. Comparison of clinic- and home-based rehabilitation programs after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410(410):225–34.
[38]. Eichler S, Salzwedel A, Rabe S, Mueller S, Mayer F, Wochatz M, et al. The effectiveness of telerehabilitation as a supplement to rehabilitation in patients after total knee or hip replacement: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;6(2):e14236.
[39]. Shukla H, Nair SR, Thakker D. Role of telerehabilitation in patients following total knee arthroplasty: Evidence from a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(2):339–46.
[40]. Harikesavan K, Chakravarty RD, Maiya AG. Influence of early mobilization program on pain, self-reported and performance based functional measures following total knee replacement. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(2):340–4.
[41]. Bindawas SM, Graham JE, Karmarkar AM, Chen N-W, Granger CV, Niewczyk P, et al. Trajectories in functional recovery for patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation for unilateral hip or knee replacement. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;58(3):344–9.
[42]. Khanna G, Singh JA, Pomeroy DL, Gioe TJ. Comparison of patient-reported and clinician-assessed outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 19;93(20):e117(1)-(7).
[43]. Doma K, Grant A, Morris J. The effects of balance training on balance performance and functional outcome measures following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2018;48(10):2367–85.
[44]. Bohannon RW. Manual muscle testing: does it meet the standards of an adequate screening test? Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(6):662–7.
[45]. Hancock GE, Hepworth T, Wembridge K. Accuracy and reliability of knee goniometry methods. J Exp Orthop. 2018;5(1):46.
[46]. Elangovan N, Herrmann A, Konczak J. Assessing proprioceptive function: evaluating joint position matching methods against psychophysical thresholds. Phys Ther. 2014;94(4):553–61.
[47]. Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing proprioception: A systematic review of possibilities: A systematic review of possibilities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):933–49.
[48]. Chan ACM, Ouyang XH, Jehu DAM, Chung RCK, Pang MYC. Recovery of balance function among individuals with total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of responsiveness among four balance tests. Gait Posture. 2018;59:267–71.
[49]. Chan ACM, Pang MYC. Assessing balance function in patients with total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2015;95(10):1397–407.
[50]. Gagnier JJ, Mullins M, Huang H, Marinac-Dabic D, Ghambaryan A, Eloff B, et al. A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(5):1688-1697.e7.
[51]. Walker LC, Clement ND, Deehan DJ. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty using the WOMAC score: A review of the literature. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(8):736–41.

Cite this article: Pranjali Natu, Diptee Bhole.  Evaluation Of Average Length of Follow-Up Duration Post Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Survey. Int J Physiother Res 2022;10(1):4088-4094. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2021.201