Type of Article: Original Research
Year: 2016 | Volume 4 | Issue 1 | Page No. 1988-1993
Date of Publication: 29-02-2016
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2016.127
MORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF FISSURES AND LOBES OF LUNGS
Jeyanthi C Gnanadeepam 1, Anjana TSR *2, T Preethi Ramya 3.
1,3 Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Kilpauk, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
*2 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Kilpauk, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Address: Dr. Anjana TSR, Department of Anatomy, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Kilpauk, Chennai-600010, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-Mail: tsranjana@gmail.com
Abstract
Background: In the background of increased incidence of vascular diseases affecting lower extremities in diabetics and smokers, arterial revascularization procedures are performed to obtain maximal perfusion to the foot, thereby restoring normal arterial pressure to the target area. Hence knowledge of the branching pattern and course of posterior tibial artery bears much clinical relevance.
Materials and Methods: The study material consists of twenty adult human cadavers (14 males and 6 females ) at the Institute of Anatomy, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Results: In 85% of specimens, the posterior tibial artery arose from the popliteal artery at the lower border of popliteus. In 5% of specimens, the artery was replaced by peroneal artery. In 87.5% of specimens, three to five perforator branches arose from the posterior tibial artery. Mostly the perforators were located in the middle quarters of the leg and the last branch was located at an average of 8.9cm from the medial malleolus.
Conclusion: The knowledge of the course and branching pattern of posterior tibial artery is essential for achieving successful wound healing and avoidance of amputation in pathologies involving lower extremities. Also, the location of perforator helps in retrieval of fasciocutaneous flaps in treating an infected wound.
Key words: Posterior Tibial Artery, Branches, Wound healing.
References
- Boileau Grant J C, Basmajian J V. Grant’s method of Anatomy. Seventh edition. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkin’s company; 1965: 366-367.
- Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy. Thirty ninth edition. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005: 1502-1503.
- Thomas Walmsley. A manual of practical anatomy: A guide to the dissection of human body. Part I. second edition; London: Longmans, Green & company; 1922: 320-322.
- Frazer J E and Robbins R H. Manual of Practical Anatomy: vol 1. London: Bailliere, Tindall & Cox; 1937: 624-627.
- Morris Human Anatomy. Eleventh edition; Newyork: The Blakiston Division/McGraw-Hill Book company; 1942: 736-740.
- George Arthur Piersol’s Human Anatomy. Philadelphia: J.B.Lippincott company; 1936: 834-840.
- Boyd J D. Textbook of Anatomy. Michigan: Macmillan; 1956: 365.
- Russel T Woodburne. Essentials of Human Anatomy. London: Oxford University Press; 1961: 566-567.
- Parson F G and Robinson A. Eighth report of the committee of collective investigation of the Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland for the year 1897-98. November 1898; 33(1): 189-203.
- Adachi B. Anatomie der Japaner I. Das Arteriensystem der Japaner. Aorta thoracalis e Arcus plantaris profundus. Bd II., Kyoto, Verlag der Keiserlich-Japan Univ. 1928; 215–241
- Senior H D. Abnormal branching of the human popliteal artery. American Journal of Anatomy. 1929; 44: 111.
- Jiji P J, et al. Hypoplastic posterior tibial artery and the enlarged peroneal artery supplying the posterior crural region: a rare variation. J Vasc Bras. 2008; 7(3): 272-274.
- Romanes G J. Cunningham’s manual of practical anatomy. 15th ed. Newyork: Oxford University Press; 1986: 910-911.
- Keith L Moore. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilins; 1980: 528-529.
- Hollinshead W H. Anatomy for Surgeons. Second edition. Newyork: Harper and Row; 1965: 803-808.
- William J Zwiebel. Introduction to vascular ultrasonography. Fourth edition; St.Louis: Saunders; 2000: 265-266.
- Keen J A. A study of the arterial variations in the limbs. American Journal of Anatomy. May 1961; 108: 254-256.
- Huber J F. The arterial network supplyng the dorsumof the foot. The Anatomical Record. 2005; 80(3): 373-391.
- Piral T, Germain M, Princ G. Absence of the posterior tibial artery: Implications for free transplants of the fibula. Surg Radiol Anat. 1996; 18(2): 155-8.
- Berish Strauch, Han-Liang Yu. Atlas of Microvascular Surgery: Anatomy and Operative Techniques. Second edition. Stuttgart: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2011: 218,219,264.
- Richard S Snell. Clinical Anatomy for medical students. Fifth edition. Boston: Little Brown & Co; 1995: 563, 564, 606.
- Ramesh S, Mohd Ali MZ, HJ Basiron N, Ajik S(2013). Propeller Flaps in Lower Limb Reconstruction: case series. Anaplastology S1: 003. Doi: 10.4172/2161-1173.S1-003.
- Maria A, Georgi PG and Lazar J. Intriguing variations of the tibial arteries and their clinical implications. International Journal of Anatomical Variations. 2011; 4: 45-47.
Jeyanthi C Gnanadeepam, Anjana TSR, T Preethi Ramya. A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE BRANCHING PATTERN AND COURSE OF POSTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY IN ADULT HUMAN CADAVERS. Int J Anat Res 2016;4(1):1988-1993. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2016.127