International Journal of Anatomy and Research



Welcome to International Journal of Anatomy and Research

b2

 

b3

Type of Article: Original Research

Year: 2016 | Volume 4 | Issue 1 | Page No. 2052-2057

Date of Publication: 31-03-2016

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2016.135


THE STUDY OF SIZE OF YOLK SAC BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND ITS CORRELATION WITH PREGNANCY OUTCOME

Geetanjali Srivastava *1, Mumal Nagwani 2, Navbir Pasricha 3, Vineeta Tewari 4M.S. Siddiqui 5Eti Sthapak 6.

*1 Junior resident IIIrd year,Department of Anatomy, Era’s Lucknow medical college, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
3 Professor, Department of Anatomy, Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
4 Professor, Department of Anatomy, Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
5 Professor, Department of Anatomy, Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
6 Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Era’s Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Address: Dr. Geetanjali Srivastava, Junior resident IIIrd year,Department of Anatomy, Era’s Lucknow medical college, Lucknow-226003, Uttar Pradesh, India. 9792171135
E-Mail: srivastavageetanjali2012@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The yolk sac is the first extra embryonic structure that becomes sonographically visible within the gestational sac and acts as the primary route of exchange between the human embryo and the mother before the placental circulation is established. The yolk sac is a round structure that is made up of an anechoic center bordered by a regular well-defined echogenic rim. It is usually 2-5 mm in diameter. The yolk sac appears at 6 weeks, thereafter increases in size, attains its maximum diameter at 10 weeks and then it starts decreasing in size. It disappears at 12 weeks. Aims and Objectives of the present study is to measure the size of yolk sac in pregnancies of duration 6-12 weeks by Transvaginal sonography and also to measure the inner diameter of yolk sac and correlate it with pregnancy outcome.
Materials and Methods: We studied 72 pregnant women of duration 6-12 weeks referred by Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The inner diameter of yolk sac was measured by Transvaginal sonography and its correlation with pregnancy outcome was studied.
Observations and Results: The mean yolk sac diameter was noted as 3.7±1.8 mm. The diameter of the smallest yolk sac was 1.25 mm and that of the largest was 8.96 mm. Yolk sac size was normal in 62 (88.57%) cases, it was smaller in size in one (1.4%) case. Further in another 7 (10%) cases, the yolk sac was found to be abnormally enlarged. In these cases where yolk sac was either enlarged or smaller in size, gestation terminated into abortion.  
Key words: Yolk sac, Gestational sac, Yolk sac diameter, Transvaginal sonography, Pregnancy outcome.

References

  1. Pereda J, Niimi G. Embryonic erythropoiesis in human yolk sac: two different compartments for two different processes. Microsc Res Tech 2008; 71: 856-862.
  2. Kurtz AB, Needleman L, Pennell RG, Baltarowich O, Vilaro M, Goldberg BB. Can detection of the yolk sac in the first trimester be used to predict the outcome of pregnancy? A prospective sonographic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 843-847.
  3. Kucuk T, Duru NK, Yenen MC, Dede M, Ergün A, Başer I. Yolk sac size and shape as predictors of poor pregnancy outcome. J Perinat Med 1999; 27: 316-320.
  4. Levi CS, Lyons EA, Lindsay DJ. Early diagnosis of nonviable pregnancy with endovaginal US. Radiology 1988;167:383–5.
  5. Hakim RB, Gray RH, Zacur H. Infertility and early pregnancy loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172:1510-17.
  6. Xie YJ, Chen M, Chen SJ. Prediction of pregnancy outcomes with combined ultrasound scanning of yolk sacs and serum CA125 determinations in early threatened abortion. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2014;41(2):186-9.
  7. Heller R, Cameron S. Termination of pregnancy at very early gestation without visible yolk sac on ultrasound. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015;41(2):90-95.
  8. Jose L.., Nanditha Abdul Latheef . Sonographic evaluation of yolk sac. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research. 2015;6(5):11-15.
  9. Moradan S., Forouzeshfar M.F. Are abnormal yolk sac characteristics important factors in abortion rates?. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility 2012;6(2): 127-130.
  10. Shetty AS, Hegde D, Shetty BSK, Padubidri JR. Yolk Sac Abnormalities –Is it a Reliable Indicator of Abortions? – A Prospective Study in the Population Residing in Rural Setup of Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. JPharm Biomed Sci2015; 05(05): 380-384.
  11. Adija P, Selvi C, Rai L, Hebbar S. Evaluation of yolk sac diameter and embryonic heart rate as prognostic factors of gestational outcome in early singleton pregnancies. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences (SJAMS), 2015;3(2A):543-550.
  12. Tan S. et al. Abnormal sonographic appearances of the yolk sac: which can be associated with adverse perinatal outcome? Med Ultrason 2014;16(1):15-20.
  13. Berdahl DM, Blaine J, Van Voorhis B, Dokras A. Detection of enlarged yolk sac on early ultrasound is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril 2010;94:1535- 1537.
  14. Malinowski W. Yolk sacs in twin pregnancy. Ginekol Pol. 2000;71(8):815-818.
  15. Cho FN, Chen SN, Tai MH, Yang TL. The quality and size of yolk sac in early pregnancy loss. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;46:413-418.
  16. Varelas FK, Prapas NM, Liang RI, Prapas IM, Makedos GA. Yolk sac size and embryonic heart rate as prognostic factors of first trimester pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138:10-13.

 

Geetanjali Srivastava, Mumal Nagwani, Navbir Pasricha, Vineeta Tewari, M.S. Siddiqui, Eti Sthapak. AN ANATOMO-IMAGISTIC STUDY OF INTERSPHENOIDAL SINUS SEPTUM. Int J Anat Res 2016;4(1):2052-2057. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2016.135

b2



b3




Search

Volume 1 (2013)

Volume 2 (2014)

Volume 3 (2015)

Volume 4 (2016)

Submit Manuscript