International Journal of Anatomy and Research



Welcome to International Journal of Anatomy and Research

b2

 

b3

Type of Article: Original Research

Year: 2016 | Volume 4 | Issue 3 | Page No. 2804-2808

Date of Publication: 30-09-2016

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2016.335


A MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF VARIATIONS IN SACRAL HIATUS OF DRY HUMAN BONES

Mritunjay Pandey.

Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Major S. D. Singh Medical College & Hospital, Farrukhabad (U.P.), India.

Address: Dr. Mritunjay Pandey, Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Major S. D. Singh Medical College & Hospital, Farrukhabad (U.P.), India.
E-Mail: mritudoc@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The present study was carried out on 100 dry sacra to evaluate the different morphometrical variations of Sacral Hiatus according to sex among the population of west Bengal.
Materials and Methods: The different parameters of 100 Sacrum (50 male, 50 female) were studied by naked eye observation and measured with the help of Martin’s callipers.
Observation and results: The most common shape of Sacral Hiatus was Inverted-U shaped, followed by Inverted-V shaped. The apex was most commonly present at the level of 4th Sacral segment and the base of the Sacral Hiatus was present most commonly against the body of 5th Sacral segment. The mean length of the Sacral Hiatus of male Sacra was 19.86mm, whereas that of female Sacra was 21.12 mm.
Conclusion: No significant sexual dimorphism exists considering all the parameters of Sacral Hiatus. There are anatomical variations in the shape and level of the Sacral Hiatus which may lead to failure of caudal anaesthesia.
Key words: Dry Sacra, Sacral Hiatus, Epidural/Caudal Anaesthesia.

REFERENCES

  1. Strandring S. Gray’s Anatomy: ed. Newell RLM. The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 40th edition. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2005:724-728
  2. Mishra SR, Singh PJ, Agarwal AK, Gupta RN. Identification of sex of Sacrum of Agra region. Journal of Anatomical Society of India 2003;52(2):132-136.
  3. Krogman WM. In the Human Skeleton in Forensic medicine. Thomas. Springfield (Illinois); 1962:214
  4. Nagar SK. A Study on Sacral Hiatus in dry human Sacra. Journal of Anatomical Society of India: 2004;53(2):18-21.
  5. Suma HY, Kulkarni R, Kulkarni RN. A Study of Sacral Hiatus among Sacra in South Indian population. Anatomica Karnataka. 2011;5(3):40-44.
  6. Kumar V, Pandey SN, Bajpai RN, Jain PN, Longia GS. Morphometrical study of Sacral Hiatus. Journal of Anatomical Society of India. 1992;41(1):7-13.
  7. Parashuram R, Morphometrical study of Sacral Hiatus using isolated dry Human Sacra: 2008
  8. Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Satoh K, Kikuchi S. An    Anatomical Study of the Sacral Hiatus: A Basis for Successful Caudal Epidural Block. Clinical journal of Pain 2004;20(1):51 - 54.
  9. Trotter M, Letterman GS, Gordon S, Variations of the female Sacrum: their significance in continuous caudal anesthesia. Surg., Gynec. And Obst. 1944;78:419-424.
  10. Aggarwal A, Aggarwal A, Harjeet, Sahni D. Morphometry of Sacral Hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block. Surgical and Radiological Anatomy: 2009;31:793-800.

 

Mritunjay Pandey. A MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF VARIATIONS IN SACRAL HIATUS OF DRY HUMAN BONES. Int J Anat Res 2016;4(3):2804-2808. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2016.335

b2



b3




Search

Volume 1 (2013)

Volume 2 (2014)

Volume 3 (2015)

Volume 4 (2016)

Submit Manuscript