International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research



Welcome to International Journal of Physiotherapy and Research

b2



b3

Type of Article : Original Research

Year: 2016 | Volume 4 | Issue 3 | Page No. 1540-1545

Date of Publication: 11-06-2016

DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2016.127

EFFECT OF FOOT POSTURE INDEX ASSOCIATED WITH BODY MASS INDEX AND STANDING BALANCE IN HEALTHY POPULATION: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

Anand Heggannavar 1, Preeti Ramannavar *2, Santosh Metgud 3.
 

1 Assistant Professor, Orthopedic Manual Therapy, KLE University, Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
*2 (MPT), Post-Graduate, KLE University, Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
3 Associated Professor, HOD of Orthopedic Manual Therapy, KLE University, Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

Corresponding author: Dr. Preeti Ramannavar (MPT), Post-Graduate, KLE University, Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
E-Mail:
vishalm@live.in

Abstract:

Background: The  ankle  and  foot  complex  play a  critical  role  in  maintaining  erect  posture,  as  also  in adaptation  to  supporting  surfaces,  The  Foot  Posture  Index  (FPI),  which  was  developed  by  Redmond  AC  in 1998. FPI provides  quantitative  measurements  of  the  typical  deviations  of  foot  posture  and  is sensitive  enough  to  detect  any  structural  dysfunction  in  the  foot. The  BMI  is  defined  as  the  body  mass divided  by  the  square  of  the  body  height,  and  is  universally  expressed  in  units  of kg/m2,  resulting  from  mass  in  kilograms  and  height  in  meters. Commonly  accepted  BMI  ranges  are  underweight:  under  18.5,  normal weight:  18.5  to  25, overweight: 25  to30, obese: over  30.
Purpose: To find the effect of foot posture index associated with body mass index and standing balance in healthy population
Materials and Methods: An observational study with 30 participants age between 18 to 30 were recruited in the study, where body mass index, foot posture index and standing balance was noted using the balance master.
Results: The study revealed that no statistically significant difference between the foot posture index, body mass index and standing balance
Conclusion: There is no effect of foot posture index associated with body mass index and standing balance in healthy population .
Key Words: Foot posture index, BMI, Balance.

References

  1. Mueller MJ. The ankle and foot complex. IN:  Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint structure andfunction, a comprehensive analysis. 4th ed.  Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 2005. p. 437-77.
  2. Hertel J, Gay MR, Denegar CR. Differences in  postural control during single-leg stance among  healthy individuals with different foot types. J AthlTrain 2002; 37:129-32.
  3. Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus: analysis and treatment. Phys Ther 1987; 67:688-94.
  4. Bernier JN, Perrin DH. Effect of coordination training on proprioception of the functionally  unstable ankle. J  Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998;  27:264-75.
  5. Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures  on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train.2005; 40:41-46.
  6. Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of Selected lower limb muscles during gait. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2(35):1-9.
  7. Kaufman K, Brodine S, Shaffer R, Johnson C,  Cullison T. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27:585-93.
  8. Murphy D, Connolly D, Beynnon B. Risk factors  for lower extremity injury: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37(1):13-29.
  9. Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA:  Development and validation of a novel rating System for scoring standing foot posture: The Foot  Posture Index. Clin Biomech 2006;21:89-98.
  10. Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the foot posture index. J Foot Ankle Res 2008;
  11. Keenan AM, Redmond AC, Horton M,  Conaghan PG, Tennant A. The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:88-93.
  12. Morrison SC, Ferrari J. Inter-rater reliability of the foot posture index (FPI-6) in the assessment of The paediatric foot. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2:1-5.
  13. Dahle LK, Mueller M, Delitto JE. Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. Journa of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.
  14. Sun, Albert (August 28, 2015). How Often Is B.M.I. Misleading?. New York Times. Retrieved August 31,2015.
  15. Korevaar, Nick (July 2003). "Notes on Balance and actual national data" (PDF).[self-published source].
  16. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett MA. The longitudinal arch. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Mar;69(3):426-8.
  17. Target R, Mathieson I. Evaluation of foot posture development in children between three and eleven years of age using the foot posture index. J Foot Ankle Res 2010; 3(Sl 1):17.
  18. Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the foot posture index. J Foot Ankle Res 2008; 1(6):1-9.
  19. Al Abdulwahab SS, Kachanathu SJ. The effect of various degrees of foot posture on standing balance in a healthy adult population. Somatosensory & Motor Research. 2015 Jul 3;32(3):172-6.

 

Anand Heggannavar, Preeti Ramannavar, Santosh Metgud. EFFECT OF FOOT POSTURE INDEX ASSOCIATED WITH BODY MASS INDEX AND STANDING BALANCE IN HEALTHY POPULATION: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY. Int J Physiother Res 2016;4(3):1540-1545. DOI: 10.16965/ijpr.2016.127

b2



b3




Search

Volume 1 (2013)

Volume 2 (2014)

Volume 3 (2015)

Volume 4 (2016)

Submit Manuscript