Quick Links
Archives
How
to
cite
this
Article:
K.Praveen,
R.Saranya.
COMPARATIVE
STUDY
OF
CARRYING
ANGLE
IN
SOUTH
INDIAN
POPULATION.
Int
J
Anatomy Res 2016;4(4):3138-3141. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2016.421.
Type of Article: Original Research
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2016.421
Page No.: 3138-3141
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CARRYING ANGLE IN SOUTH INDIAN POPULATION
K.Praveen *
1
, R.Saranya
2
.
*1
Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Al-Azhar Medical College and Super Specialty Hospitals, Thodupuzha, Kerala, India.
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Pondicherry, India.
Corresponding
author:
K.Praveen,
Assistant
Professor,
Department
of
Anatomy,
Al-Azhar
Medical
College
and
Super
Specialty
Hospitals,
Thodupuzha,
Kerala, India.
E-Mail:
dr.pravin@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Carrying
angle
(CA)
is
the
acute
angle
made
by
the
median
axis
of
the
arm
with
that
of
the
fully
extended
and
supinated
forearm.
Studies
conducted
to
compare
the
differences
between
radiologically
and
clinically
measured
carrying
angle
are
only
few
and
mostly
showing
contradictory
results.
Furthermore,
there
is
a
dearth
of
evidence
in
the
literature
regarding
differences
between
the
CA
in
both
sexes
depending
upon
the
ossification
of
arm
and
forearm bones.
Aim:
To compare the data obtained by measuring CA by manual and radiographic methods in age group 16 - 25 years.
Materials and Methods:
CA was measured in 100 individuals of both sexes by clinical and radiological methods using manual goniometer.
Results:
The present study shows significant gender difference and no significant difference between the clinical and radiological methods.
Conclusion:
Unnecessary exposure of X-rays to children, young adults and pregnant women can be avoided, by measuring CA by clinical methods.
KEY WORDS: CA, Post-Pubertal Age, Clinical & Radiological Methods, Elbow Prostheses.
References
1
.
Julien
Chapleau,
Fanny
CanetA,YvanPetit,G-Yves
Laflamme,
Dominique
M.
Rouleau,
.
Validity
of
Goniometric
Elbow
Measurements
Comparative
Study
with a Radiographic Method.Clinical
Orthopaedics and Related Research 2011;469(11):3134-3140.
2
.
Yilmaz
E1,
Karakurt
L,
Belhan
O,
Bulut
M,
Serin
E,
Avci
M..
Variation
of
carrying
angle
with
age,
sex,
and
special
reference
to
side.
Orthopedics
2005;28(11):1-13.
3
.
SushmithaBaskar,
Saravana
Kumar.
Variations
in
Carrying
Angle
between
Two
Sexes
on
Complete
Extension.
Journal
of
Pharmaceutical
Sciences
and
Research 2013;5(12):1-13.
4
.
Mehmet
Tükenmez,
Hüseyin
Dem.Rel,
S›tk›
Perç.N,
Gündüz
Tezeren.
Measurement
of
the
carrying
angle
of
the
elbow
in
2,000
children
at
ages
six
and
fourteen years. ActaOrthopaedicaetTraumatologicaTurcica 2004;38(4):274-276.
5
.
ChisomEliakim-Ikechukwu
Love
Atu,
MfonEtika
and
Gabriel
Udo-
affah.
The
Carrying
Angle
of
the
Ibo
and
Yoruba
Ethnic
Groups
of
Nigeria
and
its
Relationship with the Height of Individuals. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 2012;2(11):274-276.
6
.
B.
Kumar,
Shakunthalapai,
Biswabina
ray,
Snigdhamishra,
Siddaraju
KS,
A.
K.
Pandey,
Binu
s.
Radiographic
study
of
carrying
angle
and
morphometry
of
skeletal elements of human elbow. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 2010;51(3):521-526.
7
.
Mohammad
Omar
Alsubael,
AbdelmonemAwad
M.
Hegazy.
Radigraphic
Evaluation
of
the
Normal
Elbow
Carrying
Angle
in
Adults.
Journal
of
Medical
Science 2010;10(2):40-44.
8
.
Paraskevas
G,
Papadopoulos
A,
Papaziogas
B.
Study
of
the
carrying
angle
of
the
human
elbow
joint
in
full
extension:
a
morphometric
analysis.
Surgical
and radiological anatomy 2004;26(1):19-23.
9
.
Bernardo
Barcellos
earth;
Bruno
Costa
Silva
Mello;
Bella
Henrique
Freire
de
Carvalho;
Eiffel
Dobashi,
Tsuyoshi;
José
Antonio
Pinto;
Akira
Ishida.
Age
evolution of the carrying angle of the elbow: clinical and radiographic study.
Brazilian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2011;19(2):1-7.
10.
Chein-Wei Chang, Yi-Chian Wang, Chang- Hung Chu. Increased Carrying Angle is a Risk Factor for Nontraumatic Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2008;466(9):2190-2195.