Quick Links
Archives
How
to
cite
this
Article:
Vivek
K
Nirmale,
Mohammad
Laeeque,
Chaya
V.
Diwan.
ASSESSMENT
OF
RELIABILITY
OF
VARIOUS
CRITERIA
USED IN ADULT HIP BONE SEX DIFFERENTIATION.
Int J Anatomy Res 2016;4(4):3185-3189. DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2016.435.
Type of Article: Original Research
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2016.435
Page No.: 3185-3189
ASSESSMENT OF RELIABILITY OF VARIOUS CRITERIA USED IN ADULT HIP BONE SEX DIFFERENTIATION
Vivek K Nirmale *
1
, Mohammad Laeeque
2
, Chaya V. Diwan
3
.
*1
Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, M.I.M.E.R. Medical College, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
2
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Govt. Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.
3
Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Dr. Shankarrao Chavan Govt. Medical College, Nanded, Maharashtra, India.
corresponding
author:
Dr.
Vivek
Nirmale,
Assistant
Professor,
Anatomy,
M.I.M.E.R.
Medical
College,
Talegaon
Dabhade,
Pune,
Maharashtra
410507,
India.
Phone No: +918888891793.
E-Mail:
vivnir1101@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Background:
Confirmation
of
the
identity
of
an
individual
from
fragmentary
pieces
of
bones
after
considerable
time
lapsed
since
death
is
very
crucial
in
medico
legal
cases.
Hip
bone
is
considered
as
one
of
the
ideal
bones
for
sex
determination
as
it
not
only
reflects
the
general
differences
between
two
sexes
but also shows special adaptation of female hip bone for childbearing.
Materials
and
Methods:
178
Adult
hip
bones
(54
of
females
and
124
of
males)
of
both
sides
were
examined
with
special
reference
to
chilotic
line
index,
Ischiopubic
index
and
Acetabulopubic
index.
All
the
hip
bones
were
dry,
free
of
damage
or
deformity
and
fully
ossified.
The
personal
record
of
all
the
hip
bones
for
sex
and
race
are
all
available
with
the
bone
bank
(Govt
Medical
College
Aurangabad).For
all
the
six
parameters
and
three
indices,
we
measured
range,
mean,
standard
deviation,
P
value
and
demarcating
points.
All
the
observations
were
tabulated
and
analyzed
statistically
and
compared
with
the
previous studies. All the parameters and indices are statistically significant.
Observations
and
Results:
It
was
observed
that
when
we
applied
univariate
analysis
only
a
few
numbers
of
hip
bones
were
correctly
identified.
Further
we
combined
three
indices
in
a
single
group
and
applied
multivariate
analysis.
From
our
study
it
become
very
clear
that
very
large
number
of
hip
bones
can
be
identified correctly i.e. 85.5% of males and 83.3% females (mean 84%).
Conclusion:
Thus the sex of hip bones can be identified correctly in 84% cases by using these indices.
KEY WORDS:
Hip bone,Chilotic line index, Ischiopubic index and Acetabulopubic index.
References
1
.
Krogman W.M. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine 1962. Charles C. Thomas. Springfield, Ilinois, U.S.A.
2
.
Phenice T.W. A Newly Developed Visual Method of Sexing of Os Pubis. Am. J. of Phys. Anthrop. 1969;30:297-302.
3
.
Kelly. Sex Determination with Fragmented Skeletal Remains. J. of Forensic Sci.1979;24:154-158.
4
.
Letterman, G. S. The Greater Sciatic Notch in American Whites and Negros. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop.1941;28:99-116.
5
.
Maclaughlin,
S.M.
&
Bruce,
M.F.
The
Sciatic
Notch
Acetabular
Index
as
a
Discriminator
of
Sex
in
European
Skeletal
Remains.
J.
of
Forensic
Sci.
1986;31:1380-1390.
6
.
Nicholas Milne. Sexing of Human Hip Bones. J. of Anat. 1990;172:221-226.
7
.
Singh S, Potturi B R. Greater Sciatic Notch in Sex Determination. J. Anat. 1978;125:619-624.
8
.
R. Di Bennardo. Multiple Discriminant Functional Analysis of Sex and Race in the Post Cranial Skeleton. Am. J. phys. Anthrop. 1983;61:305-314.
9
.
Iscan MY. Determination of Sex from the Sacroiliac Joint: A Visual Assessment Technique. Florida Sci.1984;47:94-98.
1
0
.
Schulter Ellis F P. Determination of Sex with a Discriminant Analysis of New Pelvic Bone Measurement. J. Forensic. Sci. 1983;28:169-180.
1
1
.
Bruzek J. A Method for Visual Determination of Sex, Using the Human Hip Bone. Am. J. of Phys. Anthrop.2002;117:157-168.
1
2
.
Ferembach D. Recommendations for Age And Sex Diagnoses of Skeletons. J. Hum. Evol. 1980;9:517-549.
1
3
.
Albanese John. A Metric Method for Sex Determination Using Hip Bone and Femur. J. of Forensic Sci. 2003;48(2):263-73.
1
4
.
Derry: On Sexual And Racial Characters of Human Ilium. J. Anat. 923; 58:71-83.
1
5
.
Washburn SL. Sex Differences in the Pubic Bone of Bantu and Bushman. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop.1949;7:425-432.
1
6
.
P Armitage. Statistical Methods in Medical Research fourth edition, Blackwell Publishing Company.1971.
1
7
.
Jit and Singh. Sexing of the Adult Clavicle. Ind. J. of Med. Research.1966;54:551-571.
1
8
.
Mewalal:
Evaluation
of
Various
Indices
of
Adult
Human
Pelvic
Girdle
For
Sex
Determination.
Thesis
Submitted
For
The
Degree
of
Doctor
of
Medicine,
University of Delhi,1994.
19.
Pal G.P. Reliability of Criteria Used For Sexing of Hip Bones Journal of the Anatomical Society of India. 2004;53(2):07-12.